Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


BBC under fire again over Strictly vote 'fix'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 December 2008
THE BBC was last night under renewed fire over this year's controversy-hit series of Strictly Come Dancing after fans suggested the result was a "fix".
Message boards on the show's official website have been bombarded with comments from people claiming that Tom Chambers, who stars in the BBC's Holby City, should not have won.

Many said that despite trying to call repeatedly, they were unable to vote for former pop star Rachel Stevens, his main rival and eventual runner-up.

The comments include accusations that the BBC wanted to ensure Chambers, 31, won the show because he works for a BBC programme.

Other fans, however, have posted messages on the boards saying that they also had trouble getting through to vote for Chambers.

One comment on the programme's message board from a fan identified only as lovedancing1, under the heading "What a Fix", said: "I'm so angry, and I have never felt that at the end of Strictly. It completely ruined our whole family's enjoyment of it.

"It doesn't make sense, it's a fix because he is part of the BBC."

Someone calling herself sensible_woman said: "Tom should've gone last week. Also I too tried to vote for Rachel, but the lines were engaged all the time whereas my friend voted for Tom twice and got through both times without any trouble."

Many of the people posting messages said they would not watch the programme in future because of the problems. There were also calls for the BBC to offer refunds.

A viewer called Strictlyavid said: "This fix to keep Tom in as a total farce and I will never watch another series. I want my money back, I feel thoroughly cheated."

Saturday's final saw Stevens, 30, and her dance partner, Vincent Simone, receive a total of 79 points from the judges after two rounds of dancing.

Meanwhile, model and radio presenter Lisa Snowdon and dance partner Brendan Cole were awarded the maximum score of 80 after perfect tens from both their rounds, while Chambers and dance partner Camilla Dallerup came last in the first round of the show with 73 points.

But Chambers and Dallerup secured a huge public vote which saw them pass through to the "dance-off" with Stevens, while Snowdon and Cole crashed out.

For the final dance-off, the judge's previous scores were not taken into account and the final winner was decided purely by a public vote.

Viewers' concerns about the final vote follow the controversial semi-final last week where Chambers and Dallerup came last, but because the judges' vote had tied on the top two performances, show producers changed the rules to enable all three to go through to the final.

Viewers were offered phone vote refunds after the broadcaster received 1,687 e-mails and 193 calls of complaint at the decision to let all the couples stay.

Meanwhile, members of the public who recorded the final show while they were out on Saturday have also hit out at the BBC after it over-ran by 15 minutes and they missed the end.

Lisa Winter, 32, from Yatton near Bristol, said: "I was furious when the recording suddenly stopped long before the end of the show – it must have over-run by a long time. I've been watching the show for months and feel like I've been denied the best bit. You'd think the BBC could stick to a timetable.''

A spokesman for the BBC denied that the programmed had been fixed. He said: "As you would expect with such a hugely popular show, phones lines were extremely busy. This was explained on-air and people were advised to keep trying. We have checked and there were no problems with phone lines."

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 21 December 2008 9:23 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: The BBC
 
1

Daft Old Git,

22/12/2008 00:39:54
People who are so stupid as to take this drivel seriously are no doubt great fans of Holby City
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 01:07:37


Aye!, 'No-Wonder' old Bruce's favourite saying is,...


''''"Nice To See You ... To See You Nice!", with all the call money coming in!


3

Brian Hill,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 03:10:48
And we wonder why so many young people are going off the rails when they see dishonesty all around them at the highest level, everything from the George Bush victory in 2000 to this Dancing thing which apparently has just finished.

Just another reason for kids to run wild and their parents to stay at home on voting day, disenchantment, disillusionment, alienation...you get the picture.
4

donald,

glasgow 22/12/2008 04:20:09
Maybe Douglas Alexander and Kneel Kinnock should show them how to fiddle elections properly?
5

Watson,

Irvine 22/12/2008 06:56:02
The BBC is like Labour; corrupt and dogmatic. How many more times will they run a fiddle on voting by "pay-phone"? Time to scrap the licence tax and have the BBC as a pay to view by those who want to pay .
6

Guga II,

Rockall 22/12/2008 08:20:24
#5 Watson.

Couldn't agree more. The EBC is totally corrupt, and should not be financed by an iniquitous television tax on the people. The more so as it is an unfair burden on the poorer members of society.

If anyone wants the EBC, it should be converted to an encrypted, subscription service, and not this antiquated and archaic penalty on the taxpayers to support overpaid and underworked EBC personnel.


7

McP,

Cowdenbeath 22/12/2008 09:01:07
#3 "And we wonder why so many young people are going off the rails when they see dishonesty all around them at the highest level, everything from the George Bush victory in 2000 to this Dancing thing which apparently has just finished."

Aye Brian, that's right. Bush rigging the 200 election and the BBC fixing a light entertainment show are EXACTLY the same thing.

And you're right - some guy from Holby winning a dancing competition will lead to civil unrest from the nation's youngsters.

Twit.
8

Dick Lynas,

Glasgow 22/12/2008 09:02:38
There is one thing that puzzles me about these phone -in contests. Presumably the more people who try to vote for a given performer, the more likey it is that the phone lines for that performer will be busy - thus making it the more likely that folk will not be able to get through to record their vote for that performer.
Or does it not work like that?
9

James Heal,

London 22/12/2008 09:11:57
Brian Hill - yes, this programme's voting controversy and George Bush's election in 2000 - i see how those two single events have caused a downfall in the youth of today. Seriosuly? The youth of today don't know anything about UK politics, let alone Bush's win in 2000! If they did, they'd be smarter than to turn dishonest because of it! How about all the media hype about how off the rails kids are leading to kids going off the rails?....
10

Andrah,

Embrugh 22/12/2008 09:17:48
#5 Watson, 99.9% correct. The BBC IS the propoganda arm of ZaNu Labor. It has become so big and bloated with £3,500M of our cash, and has abandoned all pretences of adherence to impartiality.

BBC output should be accompanied by a Government health warning;
For example, at the beginning of every programme: "Experts say that
constant exposure to this odious drivel will seriously scramble your brain although you must continue to pay for it under threat of imprisonment".

For those who continue to believe the BBC is world class, let them test it in the market with a subscription service.
11

newtownboy,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 09:20:06
It is a good job that there is nothing important going on in the world so we have this to worry about.
12

1745,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 09:23:54
Why was a programme on Billiards allowed to overrun last evening thus cutting out a very watchable "Have I got news for you "
BBC is, as all labour dominated Corporations
totally Corrupt.
13

Bauldie Willie,

bolton 22/12/2008 09:51:03
If there was a fix it was more about the ridiculous overmarking by the judges of Rachel and Lisa. In fact, Rachel has been overmarked so much over the last few weeks that I'm convinced that the public 'did a Sergeant' and voted for Tom Chambers in protest.

Tom was praised mightily by Craig after one dance in the final who then marked him with an 8 out of 10, when after similar remarks shortly before he gave Rachel a 10.
14

Alternative (High-Octane) Fuel Head,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 10:14:36
Oh for christs sake! Who really cares? It's only supposed to be a bit of fun. You're not meant to take it seriously.

If people have nothing better to concern themselves with than who wins celebrity dancing, they need to get a life.
15

Voice of reason,

EDINBURGH 22/12/2008 10:40:43
Of course this was a fix - BBC favouring folk on their own programmes .
John Sergeant was a fix , keep him on , make him a celebrity , voters listen him on the news adopting a pro-Labour line .
And why do I have this nagging feeling that phone line money finds it's way into Labour party funds ??
16

livilion,

livingston 22/12/2008 11:06:18
Deary me, all this fuss over a Saturday night game show.

This isn't about who's the best at dancing but who 'entertains' enough to get the dull of wit to phone in for their favourite.
Panto goodies, badies and wicked queens as judges providing the narrative.

The clues are there when the participants gush tears that this is the greatest experience of their lives.
I mean come on, a 'karaoke' contest for would-be ballroom dancers? Get real!

At least be honest enough to admit this is just soft porn in the same mould as Gladiators and Bay Watch were on the same tv slot before it.
17

livilion,

livingston 22/12/2008 11:20:57
Oh before I forget wasn't it good of the BBC to clear up the voting issue from the week before by showing us how many votes the public cast for each couple the week before?
3 for Lisa 3 for Rachel and 1 for Tom, added to 3 for Lisa 2 for Rachel and 1 for Tom, so that cleared that up.
The great British voting public resting assured that their 50p's were not wasted.
18

Grad 1,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 11:33:14
Strictly a bore!
19

Grad 1,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 11:34:58
Get a grip! This is woman's stuff. Real men were watching Loch Ness Terror on the Sci-Fi channel.
20

livilion,

livingston 22/12/2008 11:39:21
23 Grad 1,]
You missed the grace and elegance of Lisa Snowdon with her amazing legs and great rack?
21

Alan B,

22/12/2008 13:34:08
Why would anyone bother voting on a tv show.

The BBC as a public broadcaster are ridiculous in the way they try to get additional revenue sources.
22

lizziedripping,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 13:44:57
Why don't they just fix it so that people can't vote more than once, and make it clear that's the case? That way the lines won't be so busy. Mind you, the BBC won't make so much out of it, but they'd be happy to live with the fall in revenue to ensure a fair contest and happy viewers, wouldn't they??
23

G,

dundy 22/12/2008 13:50:09
Unbelievable!!!!

Apparently LABOUR are at fault because the snooker overran, the public voted for the dancing bloke rather than that fancible Rachel!!!
AND now they are getting money out ofhte BBC's phone-ins!!!!
Maybe in this toppsy turvy world the SNP aren't at fault for their failures ....maybe it is the BBC's fault.....someone else's fault!!!!
24

Brian Hill,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 14:02:51
#9 James Heal. You are grossly mistaken if you don't think kids get enough of a flavour of the news around them to form opinions/attitudes.

They might not be able to articulate them but they have enough information to form these attitudes and as any good first year psychology student will tell you, attitudes (often held at a subconscious level) determine our everyday actions.
25

Liz,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 16:12:14
#26
You are talking as if the BBC make a fortune from the voting on this show. If each vote costs 15p and for example they get 500,000 votes (I would be stunned if there were more than this number of votes each week) the total amount generated would be £75,000. This is without taking into account the fact that the phone operators will also take a cut of the money, say that is 50% then the BBC 'make' ~£30,000 for every half million votes cast, hardly a fortune.
26

JG,

Fife 22/12/2008 16:45:58
I didn't think Tom was worthy of a place in the final but his show dance was the best one - BY A LOT!!!
27

Truely English,

22/12/2008 17:44:01
Strictly Come Dancing

Unfortunately, I was unable to watch this popular English cultural programme on television last night but it is clear that large numbers of viewers in Scotland were glued to their television sets, which is good for British popular culture.

Long may it continue to attract mass audiences in England as well as Scotland. We can now expect to see 100's of new classes to spring up throughout Britain as a result.
28

blackley,

Edinburgh 22/12/2008 19:25:25
Next time they should shoot the losing couple. That would concentrate the mind and ensure even bigger viewing figures.
29

Morry,

FromaFIXEDlocationinSCOTLAND 22/12/2008 21:19:41
I also think that the winners were fixed,
the other couple were in my opinion far superior to the winning couple,
BBC, I think, took pity on the Casualty Doctor who is presently is going through a lifetime crisis in that programme and therefore decided to give the great galoote
a break!
reconsidering my tv licence for the coming year!
30

Tris,

22/12/2008 21:25:17


Oh dear, oh dear.

Of course the BBC cheats. It's been caught out countless time. Why would anyone think anything else?

The BBC as it is needs to go. If we have to have a public service broadcaster it should either be like it is in the beloved USA, ie paid for by subscription, or it should be one channel, covering minority tastes that would never be provided for in the real world.

This would mean 95% of the staff, and 100% of the overpaid incompetent idiot senior management could be sacked.

Then the licence fee could be around £10.
31

go boil ur heid,

22/12/2008 22:20:56
the bbc should be sold off. fire the lot of the greedy private schoolboys who are too useless to get a proper joband' refund all the money to the public who they have been fleecing for over 50 years. they won't be missed
32

kayr,

shropshire 23/12/2008 09:45:13
I'm a fan of Strictly Come Dancing, don't get me wrong, but I do have it in some kind of perspective. Please channel your indignation towards issues that really matter. Unless of course you are and your real motive is to attack the BBC as a national institution, which does seem to be an opportunity for a lot of the comments on here. Otherwise tkae the show for what it is - Light entertainment.
33

RockyIsTheBest,

Durham 24/12/2008 09:32:35
I think Tom deserved to win mainly because his showdance was far more fun than Rachel's. However, I do feel that the problem they had with John being saved every week by the public should really show the BBC that essentially the judges scores are meaningless. I liked John Sergeant but he wasn't a good dancer.
The BBC should remove the public vote from Strictly so it's up to the Judges. The two couples with the lowest Judges scores go into the Dance Off and the couple that does the best goes through to the next round. It's fair in some respects but I sometimes felt that Lisa was undermarked.
34

Bluejen,

Edinburgh 24/12/2008 15:47:21
I don't think Tom deserved to win - he should have been put out the week before. Rachel should have won. The public should not be allowed to vote because they are clueless about dancing. That said, I have read some comments, in particular comments numbers 14 and 15. Is it really necessary to use "bloody" and Christ's name in vain. There are surely some other words they could write instead of showing ignorance. It is not meant to be taken seriously as one commentator said. It is the principle that for instance John Sergeant who has two left feet was kept in. Let the judges decide.
35

Cllr Inkster,

France 27/12/2008 17:22:00
I don`t know why anybody and especially after 10 years under the Labour meister spinners should even begin to imagine that any event they witness on the BBC is not rigged for political purposes. Tom is a hopeless dancer but he clearly now has a glittering political future as a Labour MP. Wait and see my friends...

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.