Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Fraud inquiry 'to be held into collapse of MG Rover'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 06 July 2009
THE Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is to investigate the collapse of MG Rover after a four-year inquiry set up by the government into the Midlands carmaker's demise, it was reported yesterday.
Business Secretary Lord Mandelson is expected to confirm the SFO's involvement today in a written statement to Parliament.

The move comes after a long-running inquiry has finally ended, into the collapse of Birmingham-based MG Rover in 2005 which led to the loss of 6,000 jobs at the carmaker and many more at suppliers and dealers.

The four executives in charge of MG Rover at the time reportedly said then there was "no suggestion of improper conduct".

The government launched an investigation to examine what went wrong between Phoenix Venture's acquisition of the firm in 2000 and when the administrators were brought in. But the inquiry took far longer than first thought and has cost the taxpayer £16 million to produce.

The report was finally submitted around three weeks ago and there have been calls for the findings to be made public.

However, it is understood a decision to call in the SFO could see the publication of the report withheld pending the investigation.

The Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform declined to comment ahead of Lord Mandelson's statement tomorrow. The SFO also declined to comment.

Richard Burden, the MP for Birmingham Northfield, whose constituency includes almost all of the former MG Rover site, last month pressed for publication of the report's results.

He said: "I have found it incredibly frustrating that we have had to wait so long for this report. The escalating cost of the inquiry has also been a matter of real concern."

The inquiry was set up under the Companies Act by then trade and industry secretary Alan Johnson, who said an investigation covering the two years leading up to the collapse was in the public interest.

A spokesman for the directors said that "time and again they asked for government help and didn't get it".

He said: "Four years and £16m of taxpayers' money has been swallowed up on this inquiry and the directors' major concern is that it will fail to get to the heart of the matter – why the government withdrew its offer of a loan to the company at the 11th hour, allowing 6,000 workers to lose their jobs."

The statement added: "Four years on, any suggestion of a further investigation is frankly ridiculous and smacks of kicking this issue into the long grass."


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 05 July 2009 9:30 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

,

06/07/2009 01:03:41
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
2

,

06/07/2009 03:04:28
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Neal! Whit? Haud yer Whisht!!,

06/07/2009 04:14:28
"But the inquiry took far longer than first thought and has cost the taxpayer £16 million to produce"

Can anyone tell me how these things are priced out?

How does a bunch of guys, asking another bunch of guys a bunch of questions and looking at a bunch of papers and computers and such like, cost the Public a whole bunch of money?

Answers onna post-card (sic) please!
4

Joe Plaice,

the Nutmeg of Consolation 06/07/2009 05:04:52
Could a wee loan of 16 million have kept the place running for a few months until a final deal was worked out? Seems likely.

Of course the Marxist/Trotskyites like Lady Mandy, Wee Darling, Millibrain, Broon and Bliar don't want a vibrant economy and a content workforce, they want destitution, hopelessness, fear and uncertainty, then we will follow them to their promised land of a Soviet State. (We will be in some state, that's for sure)
5

,

06/07/2009 05:06:36
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
6

,

06/07/2009 05:14:48
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
7

,

06/07/2009 05:22:52
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
8

cabrach loon,

inverness 06/07/2009 06:33:43
Why so late in doing it, the money is probably gone. To everyone other than the Govt this appeared a scam and fraud of the first order! Whoever approved the deal should go down too.
And as for letting the factories be dismantled and taken to China was worse than criminal - where is the UK's manufacturing base and ability now?
9

,

06/07/2009 08:32:50
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
10

ddmc,

06/07/2009 08:45:11
if i were a cynical person, i'd think the SFO enquiry might be a smokescreen to delay the publication of a very expensive report which took 4 years to a little longer by which time nu lie-bour will be out of power so don't get any blame
11

Phil C,

06/07/2009 08:52:09
This corrupt government has lost the moral right to make any important decisions. It has no business setting up fraud enquiries, apart from on itself. We are talking here the most dishonest and incompetent government in living memory.

The way the government allowed the collapse of Rover and then tried to spin it's way out of the flak is typical of it's hypocrissy. The £16 million it wasted on a load of hogwash is typical of it's easy spending.

Every day that goes by without an announcement of a general election is another undemocratic stab into the heart of this country. We need a general election NOW!

It seems that a weak electorate are willing to stand by while Brown and his miserable colleagues fiddle their way to next summer, wasting even more of our economy. There should be measures in place so that we can rid ourselves of self-seeking 'servants' like these. Come the revolution....!
12

Phil C,

06/07/2009 08:54:14
#10 Nail on head!
13

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 06/07/2009 08:56:04
Is there nothing these fraudsters won't do to save their own necks and get a headline? Pathetic.

4 years and yet they accuse the Conservatives of being the "do nothing" party. We're still waiting for all those apprenticeships and the other headline of 100,000 jobs for workers made redundant due to the recession. Labour - confusing a headline with actually doing something.
14

Machelpus,

06/07/2009 09:05:38
10# Spot on the SFO enquiry will indeed be secret, with Mendlesome in charge what else would you get, slippery as a snake whose poison is as lethal and NONE of us gave a vote for him to rule us.. but Brawnnobrain will assure us of how democratic we are ..
15

,

06/07/2009 09:08:55
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
16

Mike S,

06/07/2009 09:10:37
With all the "c**k-ups" by the government at Westminster in financial matters over the years perhaps the SFO should be investigating their activities.
17

ChrisEH26,

Penicuik 06/07/2009 09:15:34
Why do they bother with these enquiries? They only people who benefit are the lawyers and consultants who carry them out - oh right, just answered the question myself!!!
18

,

06/07/2009 09:57:01
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
19

Freddie and Bruno,

Paisley 06/07/2009 09:59:33
#15 Sorry

The reason for the SFO inquiry is to make sure that no-one will get to see the report until after the next election as it shows up the usual incompetence of this Labour government in their dealings with this matter.

Amazing how quickly they have gone for an inquiry into this private company when they have had to be dragged kicking and screaming into having an inquiry into the Iraq war plus they are still doing all they can to avoid an investigation into the London bombings. Wonder why?
20

The Strategist,

06/07/2009 10:20:53
Who is the SFO investigating? The directors or the Govt and the City for industrial treachery?
21

The Saltire,

06/07/2009 10:25:42
They should investigate the collapse in HBOS shares and the take over strategy of Lloyds with the assistance of the UK government while they are at it.
22

Gordon Clifford,

Denia Spain 06/07/2009 10:52:21
#21

Totally agree with your comments. If the former directors of Rover can be investigated under The Companies Act, when will the Government undertake a similar exercise against the bankers responsible for the collapse of The UK economy. There can be no doubt that they are guilty of gross dereliction of duty under the Act by failing to carry out proper risk assessments, and exercise due diligence, when carrying out their activities. The sums of money involved in the Rover case pale into insignificance compared with the billions lost by the banks. Only when the people responsible are brought before the courts will the full story be known and those responsible duly punished
23

All or nothing,

06/07/2009 11:12:57
#22

Some good points
24

Xhile,

Downthere 06/07/2009 11:30:58
This is a typical underhand trick by this appalling Labour Government.
The whole affair stinks to high heaven!
It's quite obvious there is something in the Enquiry Report that Gordon Brown and his band of toadies are desperate to conceal for as long as possible.
My own suspicions are that Gordon Brown, who was visiting China just before MG-Rover collapsed, allowed the Chinese to understand that he wouldn't move to save MG-Rover and they could asset strip Longbridge if they withdrew their offer of a joint venture and waited for the collapse.
He happily agreed with the DTI Minister, Paticia Hewitt, that NO finance (a loan not a grant) would be made available. The DTI chief said at the time "we have better things to do with our money".
Much is made about the huge MG-Rover debt at the time of the collapse - what is NEVER mentioned is that almost all of that debt was to the MG-Rover Group itself, it was an internal debt, very little indeed was owed to outside creditors, even the suppliers!
It's worth remembering that the MG-Rover site is huge and worth a lot of money - part of the site is owned by the Regional Development Agency Advantage West Midlands who happily sat on its collective hands and smirked as 6,300 people lost their jobs!
This Government is made up of the worst scoundrels I have ever seen in politics in my life.
If there was any fraud involved in this sorry tale I know where I would look first - and it would be in London not Birmingham!
25

Gordon Clifford,

Denia Spain 06/07/2009 11:35:04
#24

Good post, rogues and scoundrels indeed !
26

drunken proffet,

Tassy 06/07/2009 12:01:13
As long as the pension fund is OK they could be the good guys. It used to be a popular move for medium sort of companies to offer a free superannuation fund and the workers were more than glad that it was there. However the insurance guys wrote it up in such a way that the management could draw on it as well when they retired. The management got the tax concessions and emptied the fund when they retired. It was left to the buyers of the company to replenish it. A bit rough for the staff if they were asset strippers. I knew about it thirty five years ago, the government knew about since it was legal, the insurance companies also since they were selling the product. Now do you realise why I believe that the Trade Unions should get rid of the guys in the funny hats and employ University graduates. You know it makes sense. That statement certainly wrings a bell, I must have copied it from someone.
27

Jay Kay,

06/07/2009 13:19:56
Three more soldiers die as Afghan toll hits 174 ????

Can someone please tell me what the f o o k are we fighting for in Afghanistan???

Is it one upmanship? we know the Russians got their asses kicked is it just to prove a f o o kin point.

Please look for f o o k sake just give it a rest and bring the boys back home eh.

There is really is f o o k all there man.
28

long live the supermarkets,

every little hurts 06/07/2009 14:24:37
To begin with we were fighting to oust the Taliban and find Mr Bin Laden (though we mysteriously failed to catch him because of a 'reluctance' to commit American troops at the critical moment)! Then we got distracted by Iraq, fumbled about what do with all this poppy growing, killed one too many poor Afghans accidentally, and allowed the Taliban to reassert themselves (partially) as 'defenders' of Afghanistan. Now we 'cannot leave' because the elected but rather ineffectual and wildly corrupt Karzi government would probably collapse, leaving the poor Afghans back with the Taliban - except in the North where for ethnic reasons they would probably be effectively resisted. In other words it is all terribly complicated and I doubt there is anyone with any sense who imagines that they have a solution! Sadly, especially if you are an Afghan.

29

long live the supermarkets,

every little hurts 06/07/2009 14:31:52
United States - 26,215
United Kingdom - 8,300
Germany - 3,465
France - 3,200
Italy - 2,850
Canada - 2,830
Poland - 1,990
Netherlands - 1,770
Australia - 1,490
Romania - 860
Bulgaria - 820
Spain - 780
Denmark - 700
Turkey - 660
Belgium - 650
Norway - 588
Czech Republic - 580
This was the grand total of troops in April 2009.
30

go boil ur heid,

06/07/2009 15:16:41
they are fighting in afghanistan for business contracts. human life is the entrance fee.
31

The Saltire,

06/07/2009 17:30:55
30

Enlightened post and very well put.
32

IainGlasgow,

06/07/2009 18:14:47
Why couldn't Peter Mandelson have got his Bilderberg cronies to help MG Rover in the first place? The Rothschilds alone are rumoured to be worth US $500 trillion and still creaming even more off of taxpayer funded "bailouts" and interest on Fiat Currency all over the Western world as well as interest on Third World debt.

Put that in context the United States national debt is $12 trillion and the UK debt is less than £1 Trillion.

In the grand scale of world financial power Gordon Brown and even Barack Obama are just pawns. The real power lies with the global bankers who fund fraudulent bogus charities like Common Purpose.

acpscotland.wordpress.com

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.