Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


You must be taking the ****! Contaminated bunch of bananas is a £15,000 work of art

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 22 April 2009
FOR those who claim contemporary art is one gigantic hoax – perhaps this is the perfect example.
Six bananas sitting on a window sill at the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art. The result: The most talked about feature of a new international exhibition. Their value: an estimated £15,000.

Bananas, urine (injected) by the German artist Andreas Slominski, has taken its place alongside delicate glass sculptures, abstract paintings and prints, in an exhibition of the "best of the best" of new international art.

Slominski specialises in absurdist riddles, say experts, and would delight in the bafflement his work is causing visitors to the Edinburgh gallery.

The artist – and gallery staff – have left it tantalisingly unclear how or what the bananas are injected with, if anything. They are "replenished" every few days.

"We are saying this is art," said the director of the Scottish National Gallery of Modern Art, Simon Groom. "Slominski is a very established artist. A lot of his work is slightly slapstick.

"They are being replaced as often as is needed."

The top-floor show at the gallery, Two Horizons, shows work owned by two young European collectors, Charles Asprey and Alexander Schröder. The exhibition embraces the new trend for having no labels on the walls, relying instead on a floor plan guide – a move that only adds to the confusion over the bananas.

One visitor to the exhibition yesterday described how his young son picked up the bunch and asked to eat one – before security guards quickly stepped in.

Mr Schröder, who owns the Slominski, is a well-known German art collector, while Mr Asprey, the jewellery family scion and former art dealer, is quietly becoming an important presence on the Edinburgh art scene.

Two Horizons includes work by the Scottish artist Lucy McKenzie, the Turner Prize winner Gillian Carnegie and Isa Genzken, the leading German artist and a darling of the London contemporary scene.

One work, Derailed 1, by Tom Burr, shows a white wooden banister with mysteriously missing struts.

But in a talk at the gallery , Mr Asprey found himself fielding questions on the bananas. "It's about not taking art too seriously," he said.

With the ripening bananas having to be replaced every few days (a bunch of six costs 72p at Tesco), the value of Slominski's work lies in the artist's certificate, Mr Asprey explained.

"Some people have a problem with that, but if you were to put that into an auction, it could make £15,000," he said. "Value is a strange thing. It's only got a value if someone else wants it. They are filled with urine. Or maybe they are not filled with urine," he said. "It's ambiguity."

Slominski, born in 1959, became famous for the sawn-off stump he planted among the trees of Berlin's famous Unter den Linden, provoking a police investigation. In 2005 the Serpentine Gallery staged a retrospective of his work.



DUNG DEAL

TURNER Prize-winning artist Chris Ofili was celebrated for his paintings using elephant dung.

British artist Anya Gallaccio arranged the leaves and petals of 10,000 red roses on a gallery floor and left them to shrivel.

Radical Chinese artist Gu Dexin arranged pigs' brains in a courtyard and left them to rot.

Damien Hirst's art has included preserved cows, sheep, shark and fish.

Page 1 of 1

 
1

redhead1,

Toronto 22/04/2009 01:35:42
Every good artist lays an egg on occasion.... or a banana!
2

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 22/04/2009 02:06:11



And we are all going,..."Bananas"!, are we not?


3

Julian.,

edinburgh 22/04/2009 03:12:52
Simple solution. Don't comment on it. Just inflates the guy's ego.
4

Inspector Cluedo,

Japan 22/04/2009 04:57:52
Ha! Very ironic, Julian!
5

Rabhairt,

Cannons Creek Australia 22/04/2009 06:41:05
#3/4 this is not a comment it is just something I typed, now that makes as much sense as those bananas being art, by the way....I have a lovely bunch of coconuts, here they are a' standing in a row la la la la etc, I am offering them for sale on Ebay for 50,000 quid.
6

Brodric,

22/04/2009 07:48:21
This kind of stuff is a lot of pretentious clap trap from self important people who are so far up their own bahookeys that they can't see the light.

Totally without any merit or value, except from other pretentious folks who want to own something off the wall by somebody famous, no matter how stupid.
7

JayJay,

Right here 22/04/2009 07:57:03
I have a fruit bowl on a shelf in the kitchen.

How much am I bid Mr Asprey? If I can tempt you further, it looks like a "fruit bowl" but in an ironic way....and something is missing, but you have to guess what it is.

The art establishment is currently greeting about lack of funding in the UK. I should think its a good thing they are not awash with cash. They'd end up spending £15k on something you can get in Asda for 76p.
8

Rambo The Jambo,

Edinburgh 22/04/2009 08:24:55


.............The artist – and gallery staff – have left it tantalisingly unclear how or what the bananas are injected with, if anything. They are "replenished" every few days..............

But they just reported two paragraphs up that they are injected with urine.

Methinks someone is taking the urine here.

I'm going to buy some at Tesco's right now, copy this article and put it on eBay.
9

Rambo The Jambo,

Edinburgh 22/04/2009 08:34:02

I have a large crystal fruit bowl which is lying it two parts as I put it under running water straight from the fridge. It’s been lying on my kitchen table for two years. It’s a contemporary piece and an abstract example of my retrospective clumsiness.

It could be one bowl or it could be two bowls, depending on the perspective of the viewer. It is the ambiguity of the piece which I find the most interesting. It is becoming an important presence on the Edinburgh art scene.

If I put it on show at the Scottish Gallery of Modern Art will I become the darling of the London contemporary scene?

10

AitkenS,

Borders 22/04/2009 08:51:43
Public money used to raise stupity to an art form.
Who was/is paid what to fill the bananas every few days? Referral to the Public Accounts Committee really should be considered?
Do the staff wash their hands after the event? I can see Health and Safety issues here.
Does the "exhibit" carry an EU warning that children under 3 should not approach them or that it may have been in contact with NUTS!
Why restrict the hurling of money to the favoured few in the NGMA? Let a few more jobs-worths get a share!
11

MoiraMac,

22/04/2009 09:12:18
"Yes, we have no bananas
We have-a no bananas today.
Just try those coconuts
Those wall-nuts and doughnuts
There ain't many nuts like they.
We'll sell you two kinds of red herring,
Dark brown, and ball-bearing.
But yes, we have no bananas
We have no bananas today."
12

aljok.23,

the world 22/04/2009 09:13:13
I'm not biting.
13

Charles Linskaill,

Edinburgh 22/04/2009 09:20:04

Why are we all speaking "bananas" on budget day?

14

Boy Wonder,

22/04/2009 09:21:25
Mr Andreas Slominski and the people who tell us this art are all established w**kers of the highest order.

Yup! We noticed that, mate! We noticed that!!!
15

Rea Sonable,

Edinburgh 22/04/2009 09:26:20
It is our own beloved society which has forced artists to stoop to this level - we are no longer shocked by anything we see: films of shootings, torture, monsters, aliens...we have become so blasé that the only reaction which can be provoked in us is 'outrage' at how other people are making money from a bunch of bananas that may or may not be injected with urine.

Bring back the old days when a flash of ankle was all that was needed to set society swooning.
16

MoiraMac,

22/04/2009 10:06:57
#15 Rea Sonable! Sorry 'a flash of ankle' never did it for me, especially not hairy ones!

Bananas are probably more to my taste! I'll bite! CHOMP!

I've just had one on toast with strawberry jam! Very Tasty!
17

Noodle doodle,

Chinstroker Mews 22/04/2009 10:08:21
hmm yes, hmm yes, I particularly enjoy the juxtaposition of the natural goodness of the fruit mixed with the toxic excretion of urine...this, is saying, look at this mixture, this mixture of input and output of the human body, the bananas goes in, the urine comes out. But, wait! What is missing? Yes, yes, we are missing. The human is missing. This isn't just about bananas filled with p*sh, this is about the absence of man... the vacuum at the centre... it moves one to tears.

PS You can make your own by buying a bunch of bananas from tesco for a £1 and then p*shing all over them. Stuff 15 grand.
18

MoiraMac,

22/04/2009 10:15:34
#17 Noodle doodle! You are a artist! Are you certified? Have you got a certificate?
19

Artist,

glasgow 22/04/2009 10:38:57
A corrupt joke !Just waste more dosh on non Art!
20

Ninian-UK,

22/04/2009 10:45:55
WARNING!!!

The bananas are not 'original' art - they are copies / fakes / reproductions! We have been warned by art guru, Tom Cornwell that "They are "replenished" every few days".

Do the 'replenished' bananas have exactly the same curvature as the 'originals'? Are there the same number of bananas in each 'replenished' hand? Have the original bananas been whisked away by renowned art thief, Fyfe McFyfes, or have they been 'decently and reverently consumed' by the museum curators in their lunchtime sarnies?

Before I fork out for a possibly fraudulent copy of a deeply thought provoking work of art (it made me think how much I loathed mashed-banana sandwiches as school), I want to know whether the bananas now on view are actually worth their estimated price tag of £15,000 or whether, as mere copies, I should be able to get them for less (more than one person has already quoted that well known London art dealer, Tesco, where copies are apparently on sale).

For my part, I bet these are fakes, flown in secretly from a 'banana republic' that churns out cheap copies, worth less than £1, to dupe wealthy and gullible 'young European collectors.'
21

Nelson51,

Newcastle 22/04/2009 13:02:23
£15,000 ?. They are are not even Ff Ff Fyfes, they are Ff Ff Ffakes.
22

uno.who,

Livingston 22/04/2009 13:07:39
This just proves what Simon Groom and alleged "art" afficionados are the ones that are full of p!sh.

They need to cut the funding and sack Groom.

"It's not about taking art too seriously" .... oh really? Then why are you taking advantage of any mentally subnormal being who might consider paying more than 75p for contaminated fruit (and didn't someone just get the jail for doing that in a supermarket?)
23

Tom Cambeul,,

North 22/04/2009 13:09:08
Are these people smoking or injecting? Apparently they are using some mind altering substance.
24

The Browne Gothic,

Medieaval Nottinghamshire 22/04/2009 14:04:10
The light is good. Art is often an opportunity to seek out the eye and stretch the imagination - Dali'esque maybe ....... but don't tell Sotheby .......
25

,

22/04/2009 14:43:18
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

Scottish Golf History,

Edinburgh 22/04/2009 14:55:50
I remember when my Granny used to have wax fruit in a bowl. Clearly an art lover ahead of her time.

Does this mean Madame Tussauds could start embalming real people and displaying them as art? I'd pay to see a stuffed Sir Fred Godwin.

27

Disgusted in the US,

Smalltown, USA 22/04/2009 16:25:28
Is this guy smoking crack or was it too much Bell's?
28

,

22/04/2009 17:25:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
29

Phillip,

22/04/2009 17:30:39
As an professional artist I feel that I must "inject" myself into this discussion.

Bananas injected with urine and placed on a windowsill is a perfect example of what is wrong with contemporary art criticism, professional art education & the public funding of art. I was often rediculed during my studies precisely because I adhered to more traditional conceptions of art & beauty in some things yet also refused to adhere to more modern rules about "art" in others.

For example, to be art something has to be a created object which requires skill in its creation and that engages the viewer emotionally butis also manifestly beautiful. A pile of excrement is definitely emotionally engaging and also definitely a created object, but it is also definitely NOT art. By that definition, Found Objects and simple object manipulations such as these bananas are not in any way shape or form Art. Neither was the pile of trash in the middle of the floor that was once exhibited by art until the museum janitorial staff accidentally vacuumed it up.

I also believe there should be a certain degree of permanence for something to be art. For that reason I see do not find performance art to be Art. Performance art is a form of theatre and not Fine Art in the manner of sculpture and painting.

At the same time, I am more than willing to accept as art things that are made using media that Art Schools and Art critics refuse to accept. The Fine Art World refuses to accept that stained glass, traditional mosaics, quilts, embroidery, tapestry & weaving can possibly be fine art. They are usually referred to as crafts or folk art. Yet that decision is based solely on their having traditionally been made by artisans & the working class instead of the over-educated and/or wealthy.

I find it amazing that the same people who would classify the cathedral windows at Chartres or the byzantine mosaics at the Hagia Sophia as building crafts instead of art, are also more than happy t
30

Phillip,

22/04/2009 17:31:01
Continued due to truncation:

I find it amazing that the same people who would classify the cathedral windows at Chartres or the byzantine mosaics at the Hagia Sophia as building crafts instead of art, are also more than happy to consider a bunch of urine-filled rotting bananas as Fine Art.

The absurd direction of Fine Art began when the money for art began to flow freely from taxpayer funding instead of from private collectors and/or monarchs. Imagine the look that would have flashed across the face of Queen Victoria or Czar Nicholas if that monarch had presented with a work of "art" that consisted entirely of urine-filled bananas or a rotting cow carcase encased in wax?
31

ADavis,

Nebraska, USA 22/04/2009 17:43:21
I started coming to this site because of Susan Boyle, but this place is fast becoming one of my favorites!!
You Scots are entertaining, as for the bananas, well - I learned a new word last week, "Gobsmacked"?? The Bananas aren't, but I would call them God-Art!
32

georgia, chloe's mommy,

somewhere outside chicago 22/04/2009 17:59:38
Several years ago, I placed a loaf of Jewel brand white bread on top of my microwave. I used a few slices of it, then just let it sit there in its plastic wrap for a few days, then weeks then months. Because it was so loaded with preservatives, it did not rot or spoil (did get a bit dried out but not much). After awhile, it became almost a joke and a conversation piece. I knew I should have saved that bread, which I finally tossed out!!! It could have been worth millions!!! The bananas have to be replaced, but the bread would probably still be there, in its original wrapper, with an ungodly sell-by date stamped on the side!!! Maybe they should place the bananas on top of a microwave and run it every day for a few minutes - save them the 72p at Tesco.....
33

SOFBTRC,

Far, far from Glasgow 22/04/2009 19:45:53
£15,000 for four rotting bananas is loose change.

Walter Smith has a selection of past-their-best vegetables for sale, and he's looking for over a million.
34

Horrible Cankers @Cyber Shebeen,

22/04/2009 22:37:32
They can have a bucket of my p*ss for fifteen quid...I'll chuck in a half pound o' bananas for free...cousin works in a fruit and veg shop...
35

Phillip,

23/04/2009 01:19:11
Re #25 - What I was saying is that this work is definitely NOT ART. Only the corruption of aesthetics than came about in the late 20th century by self-appointed critics, self-indulgent so-called artists and a steady stream of gullible beaurocrats ready and willing to disburse tax payer money to support the previously mentioned parasites who would provide a greater benefit to society digging trenches than placing urine-filled bananas on a windowsill to rot or telling us what a "beautifully ironic fusion of modern technique" this is. The cows in formaldehyde that you also reference are just as much a scam on society as are these bananas. Both the public servants who waste our money on such rubbish and then "artists" themselves should be brought up on charges of defrauding the government.
36

Nighthawk,

10/07/2009 05:20:55
Disgustingly bad.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Is having a hotel for dogs a barking idea or not to be sniffed at?
Yes, they’re only dogs, they won’t appreciate it
Yes, they’re only dogs, they won’t appreciate it
No, pets deserve pampering too
No, pets deserve pampering too
If people are silly enough to pay for it that’s their problem
If people are silly enough to pay for it that’s their problem


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.