Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Iron Curtain dead as frontiers tumble

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 21 December 2007
THE final remnants of the Iron Curtain were torn down across Europe last night as eight countries joined the border-free "Schengen Zone" – removing the last traces of Europe's post-war divide and ushering in a new era of passport-free travel for millions of citizens.
Some 61 years after Winston Churchill first spoke of an "iron curtain" descending across Europe from the Baltic to the Adriatic, there were celebrations along the borders of countries such as Poland, Germany and the Czech Republic as wire fences wer
e torn down.

But although the expansion of free travel has been hailed as a boost to trade and tourism, it raises fears over the impact on immigration, with people able to move without restriction as far as the French port of Calais. It also highlights Britain's position as a non-member of the zone and the introduction of more formal passport checks between the UK and Ireland in 2009.

Alfred Gusenbauer, the Austrian chancellor, and Robert Fico, the Slovak prime minister, yesterday sawed through an old red-and-white barrier in a symbolic gesture. The enlargement, which also includes Malta, means the Schengen agreement now covers 24 European Union states and 400 million citizens, although people flying between old and new EU countries will continue to face passport controls until March.

For many in central Europe, the freedom to travel is yet another milestone in their journey from the dark days of communism, when foreign travel was a highly-restricted privilege.

"It is a dream come true for generations of Poles who fought to become a part of Europe without boundaries," said Gregorz Schetyna, Poland's interior minister. "It is only now that the process initiated in 1989, marking the fall of communism, has really been ended. The present border opening is a symbolic termination of a period of subjugation in this part of Europe."

Lech Walesa, who led the famed Solidarity trade union in its struggle with communist rule in Poland, said: "An improbable thing has happened: in many areas, Europe is becoming one state; this is the way the world should look."

But the expansion of the zone, which means it is possible to travel from Estonia to Spain without facing border controls, has raised concerns over the possible spread of crime and illegal migration. With many areas of the former Soviet Union wracked by poverty and political instability, fears have grown that the EU could see a rise in black-market job-seekers and crimes such as human-trafficking and smuggling as people to seek to profit from the open borders.

Last month, hundreds of German police demonstrated against the removal of border checks, claiming it would expose the country to waves of illegal immigrants and criminals, while in Austria a television poll found that 75 per cent of Austrians opposed the scrapping of border controls. To placate fears, along with money spent by the EU's eastern member states, the EC has invested £720 million in strengthening the frontier.

In Poland alone, which shares a 736-mile border with Russia, Belarus and Ukraine, the government has deployed 10,000 border guards to police the often wild and sparsely-populated border regions.

Dr Marek Kupiszewski, director of the Central European Centre for Migration Research, said: "If you look at the re-enforcement on the eastern border, it's formidable. Sneaking across will be very difficult." But he said some asylum seekers already living in Poland would head west to find better paid, if illegal, work.

The attractions of the West, however, might be waning as salaries and prospects in Poland increase. Father Edward Osiecki, who runs a drop-in centre for migrants in a grim Warsaw suburb, said: "The West shouldn't worry too much. Ten years ago, most migrants treated Poland as a transit country, but now more and more of them want to stay. Some have even gone to the West and come back; what they saw there sobered them up."

The border town that shaped EU free travel

FREE travel within Europe began on 14 June, 1985 when, in a small, wine-tasting border town of Luxembourg called Schengen, an agreement was signed between delegates from Germany, France and the Benelux countries (Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg) to eliminate border controls between them.

But the Schengen agreement was not unique. The Benelux countries had already had such a system in place since 1948, and the 1957 Treaty of Rome, which established the European Economic Community (EEC) already foresaw some kind of common border space between its members.

By the time the Schengen agreement came into effect in 1995, others countries had joined in including Spain, Portugal and Monaco, while Greece, Italy and Austria soon followed.

The biggest expansion of the zone occurred in 2001 with the arrival of the five Nordic countries which had already had their own passport union since the early 1950s.

The Schengen agreement was eventually incorporated into the Maastricht Treaty, the founding document of the EU. That meant that Schengen was now an integral part of the EU contract, and when the EU expanded in 2004, the new member states also became Schengen signatories.

Future expansion is already on the way, with Switzerland joining in November 2008, Cyprus in 2009, and Romania and Bulgaria in 2011.

One of the main purposes of Schengen is to combat crime and support police co-operation between member states. An important feature of police cooperation is the management of a central data bank – the Schengen Information System (SIS) – which stores information on, for instance, those wanted for arrest on suspicion of a crime, foreigners who will be refused entry to the Schengen area, individuals to be arraigned for trial and information on stolen goods such as cars, firearms, identity documents and so on.

Police in all the Schengen countries have access to the SIS. As non-members, the UK and Ireland are not able to access the system.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 20 December 2007 10:25 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

Ninian Reid,

Edinburgh 21/12/2007 07:57:40
Have no illusions - the Iron Curtain remains , draped round the steely shoulders of Putin's Russia ; Time Magazine's astonishing choice of Man of the Year.
2

bill2,

21/12/2007 08:25:02
The iron curtain is still there, just moved east a little.

We could do with one round the British Isles.
3

WL,

livingston 21/12/2007 09:04:28
We can only open internal EU borders if we are sure that the outside borders are properly closed!
4

bill2,

troll-free FH 21/12/2007 09:37:57
3
WL

You're not suggesting that the Eastern Europeans would be less than diligent, surely?

5

Mercutio,

FALKIRK 21/12/2007 10:40:55
No small thanks to The Iron Lady and her friend The Gipper.
6

Yane,

Melbourne 21/12/2007 11:00:37
#1 It was astonishing wasn't it — what the hell has happened with the investigation into the murder of Anna Politkovskaya? Very strange that she was killed on Putin's birthday.
I think Time mag is very daggy anyhow.
7

seaweasel,

Glasgow 21/12/2007 12:59:29
Once again Britain's Euroscepticism hold us back. With Ireland signing up to the Schengen Agreement, passport controls will appear on the border for the first time. Well done tabloid sheep of Britain!
8

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 21/12/2007 13:20:18
The Schengen system does not abolish passport controls. There is still an obligation to carry a passport when travelling outside one's own country, and these must be produced for inspection on demand, at frontiers or elsewhere.

Demolition of the Iron Curtain started on 27 June 1979, when the Hungarian and Austrian foreign ministers inaugurated the removal of the barrier between their countries not far from the town of Sopron. I was there, and travelled to the small ceremony with one of the senior men from the Soviet Embassy in Vienna, who was treating it as a day out with his wife. Moscow had been informed, but was not asked for approval.

This, and the resulting flood of 80,000 East Germans over the now open border within a couple of days, sparked off all the later developments, including the fall of the Berlin Wall several months later. I have no doubt of the accuracy of the adverse opinion poll results in Austria, because to this day the army has had to be deployed to stem the flood of illegal immigrants over the open border.

9

57Nomad,

california 21/12/2007 13:46:38
#9 Dr. Wilke

I believe it was 1989, not 1979. If the Hungarians and the Austrians would have tried that in 1979, God help them. The Europeans are to be congratulated for trying to make a political and economic entity that will put an end to their history of self-destruction. It remains to be seen whether or not the largest European country, Russia will join them in the 21st century or continue with their Tsarist ways.

It wouldn't hurt to remember that after he was elected but before he was inaugurated, Ronald Reagan was asked how he viewed the dynamics of the cold war. He replied: "We win, they lose." This was greeted with howls of derision from both sides of the Atlantic. The Gipper rests easy in the bosom of Abraham. Lenin roasts in hell.
10

Reider McReid,

Paisley 21/12/2007 15:16:19
#11 - 57Nomad (or should it be 57Mad?)

Ronald Regan good? Lenin evil?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha....
11

Dáithí,

San Jose 21/12/2007 15:33:43
#12 - Reider

By what method do you determine this? Lenin implemented a communist system that allowed Stalin to kill tens of millions of his own people.

So for Reagan to be 'good', he should have butchered 10's of millions?

Why did Lenin and his followers have to build a wall to keep his subjects IN? Isn't that what this story is aboot?

Why do you communists always to manage to avoid the whole point of the walls existence?
12

DaveM,

Edin 21/12/2007 15:53:07
#1 I heard Times editor quoted the other day as specifying that the 'Man of the Year' is not necessarilly complimentary - simply that it reflects the individual they believe has had the biggest influence on the world in that year - he pointed out that Stalin was 'Man of the Year' twice....
13

Upbeat,

21/12/2007 16:40:42
"Police in all the Schengen countries have access to the SIS. As non-members, the UK and Ireland are not able to access the system."

This about says it all for the absurdly insular and paranoid British.

A system now exists which shares information across all 24 Shengen states. This alerts and enables any one of them to intercept and hold someone suspected of an offence anywhere within the Shengen zone.Now it is so easy to travel far and afst across Europe this is the modern way of regulating things.

But no. Stuck in a time warp of self importance the British do not trust such a system , and wish to remain unenlightened and outside this.

So much for a Government that was swept into office with the promise " We will be tough on crime ,and tough of the causes of crime ! " So right ..with one eye closed, total mistrust of any other law enforcement aganecy within Europe and one hand behind our backs we will ...
14

Peter J.,

USA 21/12/2007 17:11:47
#9, James Wilkie: The demolition of the Iron Curtain started with the Poles in August 1980. Have you forgotten Lech Walesa and the Solidarity movement? Give credit where credit is due.
15

WL,

livingston 21/12/2007 17:33:43
#10
I hope that they check your passport when you arrive in the UK (or any other EU country) from Switzerland.
16

57Nomad,

california 21/12/2007 18:54:55
#12 R McR

R McR said:

"#11 - 57Nomad (or should it be 57Mad?)
Ronald Regan good? Lenin evil?
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha...."

These things are always relative. If one believes in the notion that the people are the property of the State, then one views Lenin as a good guy. If one believes that the State is the repository of all rights then one would naturally view Lenin as a swell guy.

Now, on the other hand if one is cheering on the enslavement of several hundred million non-Russians by the Russians as a good thing, well then, one might view the Gipper with a jaundiced eye. Perfectly understandable. If one is convinced that the idea that all men are created equal and endowed by their creator with unalienable rights that are not, can not, and never will be subject to the whims of the State, then a certain animus toward Ronald Reagan is to be expected.

From a strictly non-partisan view, one does a reality check. R. McR, I have an experiment you can easily do that may elucidate the question. Get a map of the world or a globe that was made prior to 1991. On there you will find a country, a huge county stretching from Europe in the West to the Pacific Ocean on the east. It was called the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics.

Now, get a new one and look for the USSR. Guess what? No matter how hard you look, you will not find the USSR. What happened to it? Do you remember what the Gipper said about the Cold War? "We win, they lose." Get the picture? So, on behalf of the Gipper, I would like to say to you, "Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha."
17

57Nomad,

california 21/12/2007 19:00:05
In post # 57 second paragraph, line 6, after the words, after the words, "whims of the state," should be included the words, "is a bad thing."
18

Pictus,

Stanley Bridge 21/12/2007 19:11:17
57Nomad -
In my opinion, Gorbachev had at least as much, if not a great deal more, to do with the thaw as Reagan. The times, they were a-changin' as well.
19

Kipling,

21/12/2007 21:23:04
Depends how they define crime. In 10 years time, probably sooner, criticising the EU might be considered a crime. And like for those in the former CCCP (USSR) there will be no escape. What was wrong with Interpol?
20

,

21/12/2007 21:28:19
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
21

seaweasel,

Glasgow 21/12/2007 22:23:09
Yes Kipling, and no doubt we'll all be speaking Arabic and living on a diet of straightened bananas by then too.

If Gordon and the New Labour machine have their way, I suspect that your vision of the future will be more likely in the UK if it still exists, with the EU taking in British refugees. Hopefully however this outdated Union will have been dissolved before such things happen.
22

Dr. James Wilkie,

Vienna 22/12/2007 09:36:56
#11. Quite correct. Mea culpa. It was June 1989. I hope I am a better historian than a typist!

#16. Correct as regards the movement, but the actual barrier was not removed until 1989 (Hungary/Austria in June, Berlin Wall in November, Czechoslovakia/Austria in December).

Lech Walesa has quite remarkable leadership qualities, and he is an outstanding humourist. In his company, it is near impossible to hear what he is saying because of the unceasing screams of laughter from the Poles present.

23

Dáithí,

San Jose 24/12/2007 17:07:42
Why did the wall exist at all? Is Communism/Socialism so bad that people actually have to be 'walled in' so that they won't run away from it?

Hahahaha!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.