Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Africa's animals could evolve into separate species as climate changes



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 September 2008
CLIMATE change could trigger an explosion in the number of new species in Africa, according to research from Edinburgh University.
The future loss of lakes and rivers in Africa would influence how species such as buffalo, wildebeest and elephants evolve, according to scientists.

Large populations of animals, which need water to survive, could be divided and, over time, evolve
into new species to cope with their new surroundings.

An isolated population of buffalo, unable to interbreed with others, might evolve to the size of small elephants in the future, in order to accommodate a larger stomach. Alternatively it might develop huge, long legs to carry them further distances to water and better food sources.

Researchers at Edinburgh University studied the loss of rivers and lakes in Africa millions of years ago, when forests dried to grassland.

They have shown that groups of animals became isolated from one another over large distances by the need to stay close to a watering hole, lake or river. Over millions of years the groups evolved into different species, such as gazelles, buffalo and wildebeest.

Dr Julian Derry, of Edinburgh University's School of Biological Sciences, said the findings, published today in the African Journal of Range and Forage Science, suggest that modern-day climate change may lead to an increase in the number of species in Africa, just as it did millions of years ago.

He said: "When Africa dried to grassy plains, groups of animals would stay close to their local source of water, and groups would have become separated by large distances across the plains. We believe this separation played a key role in the evolution of many of the species we recognise today.

"Modern-day climate change could break up water networks like it did millions of years ago."





The full article contains 307 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 31 August 2008 9:56 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Global Warming
 
1

Resolutions,

01/09/2008 00:24:30
Nothing new is there? Thought that this had been proved ages ago, that species evolve
2

tomi,

01/09/2008 02:25:27
Fairy stories used to begin with "Once upon a time", now we are forecast for the future.
3

Jim A,

01/09/2008 03:01:35
#2 tomi, why do you think it's a fairy story? As the planet changes then life on the planet changes as well to adapt. It's nothing new mate, it's been happening since the start of life
4

Mashimaro,

01/09/2008 05:42:32
why is there no credit on this story? Who wrote it?
5

Pilrig.,

Livingston 01/09/2008 05:47:48
2 - and of course the Earth's only 7,000 years old......
6

carrottop,

Dumfries 01/09/2008 07:48:20
You cant evolve if you have all been eaten by Africas humans who are breeding out of control. Was aids natures way of telling the human race to slow down?
7

SouthernSkye,

01/09/2008 07:53:58
Chap called Darwin knocked up a theory along these lines. one only needs to check out the wildlife on the galapagos islands to confirm it. Sparrows and Finches there have evolved into separate "species".
How much did this plagiaristic Edinburgh theory cost?
8

Unimpressed one,

01/09/2008 07:55:12
How much public money did this lot get to come up with this load of tosh? Species adapt to climate, that's pretty obvious. The climate of the African plains has been stable for millenia. The idiots that came up with this are suggesting there's something called 'modern day climate change'! WTF is that pray tell? More junk science by people who have mortgages to pay on the backs of climate change money no doubt.
9

Boy Wonder,

01/09/2008 08:38:22
Did someone think that evol;ution stopped at "now"??

Twonk!
10

Postmark-55,

China, 01/09/2008 09:54:38
For all you non-believers over there in the UK, you have Horrible Cankers, how much more than that can evolution screw up?
It just makes the rest of the world wonder what kind of climate you really have.
Is it all the rain?
Or does the fog play a part, a place for her to hide while evolving?
11

Guga II,

Rockall 01/09/2008 10:51:29
#10 Skidmark.

That's not a very nice way to talk about a lady.
12

Neil,

Glasgow 01/09/2008 11:26:00
Yo think that universities were once seats of learning. Dr Julian Derry should get fired for bring his university into disrepote with this sub-literate flannel clearly aimed squarely at getting him media coverage rather than developing science.

5,000 years BC the world was several degrees warmer than now & what is now the Sahara was verdant & home to lions, gazslles, Hippos etc etc. When the desert dried up hippos did not evolve into desert creatures like camels. The idea that such evolution will take place within a century if temperature goes back to that level (even if there were any reason to believe it would) is not one that an intelligent O level student would put forward let alone an alleged real scientist.
13

Postmark-55,

China, 01/09/2008 11:42:22
#11 Guga II,
I wasn't alking about ladies Guga, I distinctly recall talking about Horrible Cankers, and you too have seen her Beijing Diner stories. So what was this about a lady again?
14

d_devlin,

12/12/2008 03:13:56
The only change in species is columnists and they are devolving into a lower form.

several hundred species per week are thought to be bought to extinction in the rain-forests alone as a result of deforestation yet here we all are discussing climate as if it is the answer.
Co2 reductions wont stop people slaughtering wild animals.
Co2 reductions wont stop people invading and destroying their environments for the sake of natural resources.
Co2 reductions wont stop industrialist nations for dumping toxins directly into the sea or on land for that matter.
No real issues are being addressed any more!
Just money!!

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.