Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Cyclone may yet sweep away Burma dictators

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 07 May 2008
THE helicopter, flying low over the paddy fields of the Irrawaddy delta, allowed the passengers on board a view down into a sodden hell. Scattered like grains of rice by the powerful winds of the cyclone and the destructive power of the tidal wave it whipped up, were the bodies of the lost – thousands upon thousands of men, women and children.
Yesterday, the death toll caused by cyclone Nargis, which hit Burma on Saturday at about noon, rose to 22,464, with a further 41,054 missing, according to the suspiciously precise figures of the country's military dictatorship. Yet fears were growing last night that those who survived the hand of nature may still succumb to the clumsy fist of their government which, despite calling for global assistance, continued to hold back international aid agencies on its borders.

Almost 60 years of suspicion towards the outside world will not be blown away overnight, but the effects of the worst cyclone since Bangladesh was struck in 1991, killing 138,000, may yet prise open the doors of this secretive nation now faced with a rising death toll and as many as three million people displaced by the disaster, according to Save The Children. The nation's leaders appear to be hedging their bets, aware of the necessity of finding a way to provide the destitute with life-saving water, food, clothes and accommodation, but fearful of the future ramifications of opening their borders to agencies they previously dismissed as riddled with spies.

Yesterday, a single aid plane touched down in Rangoon, while across the world aid agencies remain wrapped up in red tape. The flight from friendly Thailand landed at Rangoon's Mingaladon airport, but its £200,000 cargo of food, water and mosquito nets, brought in on a Royal Thai Air Force C130 was unlikely to make the slightest dent in the national catastrophe.

Several major international aid agencies were reporting that obstacles were being placed in their way, making swift action impossible.

The military junta which has already turned back journalists and banned tourists until after the country's 10 May referendum on a new constitution – now put back until 24 May in the hardest-hit areas – has been vetting all aid workers and insisting on supplies and equipment ahead of foreign personnel. Aid agencies want to ensure that the food aid goes to the right people and want their expert staff in to oversee their projects. "We believe the papers are being processed slowly", said one frustrated officer of an international aid agency contacted from Bangkok: "But we need to be there yesterday!"

A spokesman for the International Committee of the Red Cross said it was hoping to charter a cargo plane from Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, to send in aid later in the week, but it did not yet have papers for accompanying staff.

The government, which normally shuns international attention, has at least appealed for foreign aid. Pro-democracy advocates, including the political party of detained leader Aung San Suu Kyi, have denounced the planned new constitution as a way to maintain the power of a military that has become increasingly unpopular, if not hated, by many following its brutal suppression of Buddhist-monk led pro-democracy protests in September last year.

"The military regime has never had any intention of holding a free and fair vote," said Monique Skidmore, a Burma expert and professor at Australian National University. "They don't care if everyone votes or not. They care about the outcome, and I have no doubt they will manipulate the outcome in their favour."

Inadequate warnings about the approaching storm and the poor response by authorities once it struck will further anger the population.

"The myth they have projected about being well prepared has been totally blown away," said analyst Aung Naing Oo, who fled to Thailand after a brutally crushed 1988 uprising. "This could have a tremendous political impact in the long term."

Rangoon yesterday was still largely without electricity and residents lined up to buy candles. Most homes were without water, forcing families to stand in long queues for drinking water and bathe in the city's lakes.

Yesterday, George Bush, the US president, applied pressure on the government to open its borders to American aid, saying he was ready to use the US navy "to help find those who have lost their lives, to help find the missing, to help stabilise the situation".

AID AGENCIES FACE A HUGE CHALLENGE

THE UN World Food Programme, which was preparing to fly in food supplies, last night offered a grim assessment of the destruction: up to a million people possibly homeless, some villages almost totally destroyed and vast rice-growing areas wiped out.

"We hope to fly in more assistance within the next 48 hours," a spokesman said. "The challenge will be getting to the affected areas with road blockages everywhere."

The affected region is less than 5 per cent of Burma's land area, but it is home to nearly a quarter of the country's 57 million population.

When the full force of Cyclone Nargis passed overhead, the 10,000 residents of the village of Hlaing Tha Yar, could do little but sit tight and pray their bamboo shacks stood up to the ferocious winds and for the most part, they did. Deep in the vast marshlands of the Irrawaddy delta, people were less fortunate, as winds of 120mph caused a sea surge that swept inland, killing most of the cyclone's 22,000 victims.

"No-one died around here. We were very lucky," said one resident. In the village, roofs had been ripped off about one in ten of the houses, simple bamboo structures with roofs made of leaves and walls of rush matting. But in most cases, they simply shook violently and bent before the force of the blast, before springing back up when the storm passed.

Yet the relative absence of destruction in villages such as Hlaing Tha Yar is making it all the more difficult for the government and aid officials to work out how many people have been affected, and who is in biggest need of help. However, even in Hlaing Tha Yar, 2km from the banks of the Rangoon River, there is already a shortage of clean drinking water only four days after the cyclone.

Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 07 May 2008 4:20 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Burma
 
1

catgut,

pomona 07/05/2008 00:59:54
did we not have troops in burma at one time helping to fight the red menace.
shame its always the poor that suffer and that the cyclone did not blow away the 'government' of this sad area.
2

Suzi B,

07/05/2008 01:20:37
#1
Umm, yes, and I think that is why they are so keen to keep the foreign invaders out now! Joking apart, they have reason to be highly suspicious of the motives of the US and UK, but you are right, it is a shame that the poor suffer at times like this.
3

Guga II,

Rockall 07/05/2008 03:22:39
It's more than a shame, it's a damned disgrace that the military junta in Burma will not allow in foreign assistance. If nothing else, the fact that they are a client state of China should force the Chinese government into either sending massive aid, or pressurising the junta to accept foreign aid from elsewhere.
4

Navvy,

07/05/2008 03:39:45
Burma is a basket case as a result of its completely corrupt and incompetent military oligarchy.

In the days of our not much lamented empire the country exported rice, teak from well managed forests, oil and gemstones, mainly rubies

The Scottish influence?
Burmah Oil had its HQ in Glasgow
Many of the forest officers who managed the teak were Scots as were the engineers and skippers of the Irrawady Flotilla the steamers which were the main transport

Then cane the Japanese army in 1942 many Scots soldiers were there including my father and uncle. The Japanese were stopped at Kohima and Imphal and later the British and Indian armies inflicted the Japanese army's only full scale defeats in the campaign to retake Burma.

After the war Aug San Su Chi's father became PM but was murdered and then the Army took over. Inthe North remnants of the Chinese KMT (Chian Kai Chek) moved in over the Burma Road and started the opium trouble.
The largely Christian "tribal" Karen etc north resists the military Buddhist ethnic Burman south. The storm damaged Rangoon and the Irawaddy delta where rice is grown. I have 3 Burmese staff, 1 from the north, 1 from the middle and 1 from Rangoon where his house's roof is damaged and there is no power to pump domestic water from their borehole - as system which many use. They are otherwise OK.

Thailand and now Vietnam have taken over as rice suppliers to the world. A democratic Burma could recover its rice growing and export again.

Military governments bring disaster. Napoleon, Hitler, Stalin, the middle east, Burma, japan before WWII, China ditto, Indonesia and all the rest

Pray that this natural disaster hastens the end of the military



5

Sonare,

07/05/2008 06:20:53
#4

Thank's for the interesting and highly informative background Navvy, seems like you know the country...

A population the size of the UK, with perhaps a million homes devastated... hard to imagine......

Candles burn for those lives lost and families torn apart.......Bless them.....
6

missing home,

la verne 07/05/2008 06:48:55
Awful loss of life. My heart goes out to the victims.
Catgut, Pomona...California?
7

yockel,

07/05/2008 07:22:14
Usually I agree with Guga but the real damn disgrace is that Geo Bush wants to flood the country with spies, agitators and military as a preconditon of aid.
8

Nirvana,

07/05/2008 09:02:10
#7 How wrong you are. Both Mrs Bush and President Bush pleaded to send aid, even though the USA has sanctions on the country they want to help big time. You are dealing with a typical dictatorship and as usual the average folks suffer. I think you are a far left liberal to make a comment like that. Educate yourself. Think! the USA helps every country worldwise.
9

Nirvana,

07/05/2008 09:04:40
#7 How wrong you are. Both Mrs Bush and President Bush pleaded to send aid, even though the USA has sanctions on the country they want to help big time. You are dealing with a typical dictatorship and as usual the average folks suffer. I think you are a far left liberal to make a comment like that. Educate yourself. Think! the USA helps every country world wise.
10

Suzi B,

07/05/2008 09:28:33
#8 and 9.
I think we can agree that the hearts of Mr and Mrs Bush are pure when it comes to humanitarian aid, however the cynic in me hears the words Burma oil and my head goes Iraq oil, Kuwait oil.....and I tend to think that sometimes the USA can be a little....umm... a lot actually, opportunistic at times. My belief is that the fox didn't intend to eat the gingerbread man when he asked him to climb on his back to cross the river, but when the gingerbread man climbed up onto his shoulders to avoid getting wet, well the opportunity was there and the fox was licking crumbs off his whiskers before he knew what had happened.
11

Roy,

07/05/2008 09:33:03
4 Navvy. Also worth mentioning the 1947 Panglong Agreement which brought the non-Burman states into the 'Union' of Burma on the basis that they 'shall enjoy rights and privileges which are regarded as fundamental in democratic countries.'
12

Mashimaro,

China 07/05/2008 10:59:13
Where is this fictitious country of which you all speak? I can find it on no map.
And yes they are right to be suspicious of the UKUS who will indeed flood the country with spies and agitators.
13

TimW1234,

Ottawa, Canada 07/05/2008 11:22:50
One can only hope that the despicable dictators there were caught unawares and swept WAY out to sea.

Then Burma can make a fresh start.

My great-uncle General Orde Charles Wingate of Burma must be rolling in his grave at Arlington National Cemetery.
14

Timmy B,

London 07/05/2008 11:24:50
22,464 dead - I think that's the only comment that needs addressing - without essential supplies, thousands more people will die. We can argue all we like about ulterior motives of western governments - doubtless there are many - but maybe we should concentrate on helping people survive first, then worry about the politics. Which is what I think the west is doing, and what the last thing the autocratic crazies of Burma want.
15

Agricolus the Dwarf Engineer,

07/05/2008 12:39:15
3 - Guga - this is the perfect time for China to try to counter their human rights problems and their image, by sending aid, if it can be accepted by the locals. A bit short-sighted on their part, if they don't
16

Mashimaro,

07/05/2008 13:07:03
#15 Odd how I can find MYANMAR and YANGON. Guess my atlas must be a more modern version.
17

Mashimaro,

China 07/05/2008 13:10:42
#16 http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/News/PoliticsNation/China_to_send_1_million_in_aid_to_Myanmar_Govt/articleshow/3016420.cms
18

Suzi B,

07/05/2008 13:33:27
#17
But Myanmar just doesn't slip off the tongue the same way as Burma does...but I suppose that depends on your perspective. Saying Myanmarese cat sounds wrong. Maybe it is Myanmarian cat? Myanmaronian cat? That has a ring to it.
19

Mashimaro,

07/05/2008 14:56:14
#19 Hey Suzi B. Maybe it sounds strange because you are English. Burma is after all the bastardisation of the word Myanmar. Like the Brits called Kolkata Calcutta, and Mumbai Bombay, Guandong Canton
So it would indeed be a Myanmese cat, just like Siamese with a bit more miaow.
20

Navvy,

07/05/2008 16:17:45
Hey MarshMallow #21 etc I can't find Mei Guo or Eng Guo on my atlas either!

The great thing about the English language is that tehre is not such thing as a foreign word, once we use it regularly it is English - no Academy Francais, no Pustaka Bahasa or what effer, no hiragana/katakana for imported words

Some we change and some we dont Roma=Rome, Paris-Paris, Berlin=Berlin, Moskva=Moscow, New Amsterdam=New York, Beijing=Beijing=Pekin. Your PRC folk have some pretty iffy pronounciation though I must say that my colleagues in Shen Zhen are much better than their HongKong counterparts
21

Navvy,

07/05/2008 16:18:49
#11 Roy
Thanks for that - Democratic being the operative work
22

yockel,

07/05/2008 16:26:56
Nirvana #8 #9 you obviously didn't listen to GeoBoy's speech yesterday, or are you on the payroll?

He did not plead for them to accept aid, he quite clearly pled for the placement of troops and agencies so that the need for aid could be assessed. He requested an invasion invitation.
23

Mashimaro,

China 07/05/2008 16:53:40
Well known US tactic...help you with one hand and it becomes the camel's nose
24

Guga II,

Rockall 07/05/2008 17:16:30
Mushy Marrow (The Rabid Rabbit).

All your Chinese gangster government maps probably show the whole of Asia as "China".

Why isn't your gangster government sending aid? After all, Burma is a client state of theirs, and the military junta is as much a gangster government as yours.
25

Nirvana,

07/05/2008 18:15:03
#24 Just like England during WW11, we helped the British and then we invaded them right, or did we get out. We spread democracy not dictatorship.We have a history of sending more aid to other countries then any other country in the world, and what your saying is nothing but bull.
26

American,

07/05/2008 18:37:30
#10-suzi b- Will all you "war for oil" people please clue us in on when the oil will flow at a decent price for us? I'm looking forward to that day. BTW-Yes, we did go to kuwait to help & protect the oilfields (as did other countries) because saddam invaded them--or dont you remember saddams invasion because he claimed kuwait belonged to iraq?



#12-M-"are right to be suspicious of the UKUS-as it is right to be suspicious of china too.
27

yockel,

07/05/2008 19:35:49
#27 Nirvana; The US still have troops in the UK, they are crawling all over Germany and now you want radar and misiles in Poland and the Czech Republic.

Don't forget lease lend, the Brits paid for your "aid". Just like Iraq is paying for its democracy.
28

yockel,

07/05/2008 19:39:18
#28 American; Sadam invaded Kuwait because they were drilling horizontaly into Iraqi reserves.
Right about China though.
29

John Blackley,

Florida 07/05/2008 20:40:19
Well, well, who'd have thought that an article about a humanitarian disaster would have provided a forum for the usual flamers? (yeah, okay, anyone who reads the Scotsman online would've thought it).

I'm disappointed the Mrs. Bush indulged in some predictable finger-wagging at Myanmar's government while offering aid but have to say that the people of the United States are unfailingly generous in providing aid to other countries and I hope the junta in Myanmar is not too paranoid to allow it to happen there too.

30

Suzi B,

07/05/2008 21:19:09
#27 Nirvana.
Tell me, have the British people finished paying reparations to the Americans yet for World War Two? The American help came at a price and it took Pearl Harbour to get them involved at all. You're on shaky historical ground there, mate.
And #28. I will tell you when oil will flow at a decent price for us. Come the day the US manages to 'democratise' every oil rich nation, whether they want to be democratised or not. I have a problem with the American belief that their way is the only way, which by the way makes their dogma anything but democratic.
31

Suzi B,

07/05/2008 21:35:24
I should probably have described the payments as 'war debts' rather than 'reparations', but the answer was the last payment was in 2006 I believe, for the sum of 83 Million USD, which was a small final payment compared to the sums paid out each and every year from the end of the war until that point.
32

Scottisheart,

Ontario, Canada 07/05/2008 21:52:37
Prayers for the families and lost souls.

I would question the motives of Bush as well. He should clean up his own backyard - New Orleans.

33

Mashimaro,

China 08/05/2008 06:13:31
#26 Googoo... we are sending aid. Your zionist owned media just forgot to mention that.
34

Mashimaro,

08/05/2008 06:17:05
#28 Myanmar is our client state. So why should they be suspicious of us? In fact I think this is the one place where China can and should step in and offer unlimited aid. Whether or not Beijing will see it like that is an entirely different story. I think if the Myanmese government says only a few thousand have been affected, Beijing will adjust its offer of aid accordingly. If the hysterical reporting of the western press can be believed - and we do know how they lie - then that would be a worse disaster for the country.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.