Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Karzai declared poll winner in Afghanistan

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 03 November 2009
HAMID Karzai was declared the winner of Afghanistan's presidential elections yesterday – by a commission he appointed.
World leaders raced to congratulate him on his re-election amid widespread relief that weeks of political deadlock in Kabul could soon be at an end.

But serious doubts remain over his government's mandate after he failed to poll the "50 per cent plus one vote" required by the Afghan constitution.

In an extraordinary U-turn, the country's Independent Election Commission (IEC) cancelled plans for a run-off and declared Mr Karzai the winner – despite insisting less than 24 hours earlier that a second round had to go ahead on legal grounds, regardless of rival candidate Abdullah Abdullah's decision to pull out. Pressed on where Mr Karzai's legitimacy would stem from, IEC chairman Aziz Ludin said simply: "We are the commission, we have declared."

Visibly annoyed, he dismissed suggestions his staff had been compromised by spectacular vote-rigging that saw more than a million votes thrown out in the first round.

Diplomats hope Mr Karzai will reach out to his political opponents and forge a unity government to give Nato a "credible partner" in their battle against the Taleban. But talks have already broken down between Mr Karzai and Dr Abdullah, who refused to participate in the second round, claiming it would be even more rigged than the first.

Dr Abdullah was careful to stress his door remained open, but in an apparent souring of relations, his spokesman branded yesterday's IEC announcement illegal. "(It] will not solve the problems of Afghanistan, and it doesn't have any basis in law," Fazel Sancharaki said.

Nick Horne, a former United Nations political officer based in Afghanistan for the elections, warned that, without a second round, Mr Karzai lacked a constitutional mandate. "Without a second round, he doesn't have the 50 per cent plus one vote," he said. "The point is Karzai's mandate is very, very tenuous. The question is how we move forward with a Karzai presidency, building a government the people can support."

Diplomats hope the IEC statement will herald the end of more than ten weeks of post-election wrangling.

Last night, US president Barack Obama welcomed Mr Karzai's election with as much admonishment as praise, telling the US's partner in war he expects a more serious effort to end corruption in his government.

"I emphasised that this has to be a point in time in which we begin to write a new chapter," Mr Obama said in describing his congratulatory phone call to Mr Karzai.

The president added that when Mr Karzai offered assurances, he told him that "the proof is not going to be in words, it's going to be in deeds".

UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon, in Kabul after five of his staff were killed in an attack on their guesthouse last week, welcomed the IEC announcement and congratulated Mr Karzai.

Downing Street said Gordon Brown had congratulated Mr Karzai. "They discussed the importance of the president moving quickly to set out a unifying programme for the future of Afghanistan," a spokesman said.

Afghan leader under pressure to bring rivals into government

HAMID Karzai will now have to prove his legitimacy by reaching out to his opponents, reforming a government many view as corrupt and incompetent, and quelling a revived Taleban insurgency.

Eight years after the United States picked him to lead an interim government following the overthrow of the Taleban, Mr Karzai's relationship with his western backers has grown increasingly strained.

He is under immense pressure to negotiate with Abdullah Abdullah – who has emerged as a national figurehead in the post-election drama – to reach some sort of deal on the shape of the next government. He will probably need to give up some cabinet positions to Dr Abdullah's camp in order to make it more representative – Mr Karzai is a Pashtun, whose support is mainly in the south and east, while Dr Abdullah's support base is largely among Tajiks in the north.

Mr Karzai fled to Pakistan after the 1979 Soviet invasion. In exile, he helped fund and arm anti-Soviet fighters. He served as deputy foreign minister from 1992 to 1994, after the fall of the Soviet-backed government.

At first supporting the Taleban, he later worked from Pakistan to overthrow them. He returned to Afghanistan in late 2001 as president. But corruption, slow development, his alliance with former militia leaders and civilian casualties caused by foreign forces have eroded his public support.


Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 02 November 2009 11:32 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Afghanistan
 
1

Connoisseur,

03/11/2009 00:55:06
Karzai won by default. What a shame there wasn't a playoff.
2

JWW,

Whitburn,West Lothian, 55.86667 -3.68500 03/11/2009 08:27:16
Ever wondered what the state run BBC would be saying if this election charade was happening in Iran?
3

Lianachan,

Highlands 03/11/2009 10:45:21
Another great victory for democracy...
4

Let's have the truth,

Australia 03/11/2009 11:17:40
"World leaders raced to congratulate him on his re-election"

That shows that those "world leaders" racing to congratulate him are no more worthy of their positions than Khasi (sic)
5

ddmc,

03/11/2009 11:23:17
#2 LOL very true, the Afghan vote was riddled with fraud, the 1 million votes discounted are the tip of the iceberg.
6

Lys Alf,

Scotland 03/11/2009 11:48:44
All occupier installed compliant puppet governments have to resort to curruption.

Remember the CIA organised, trained and backed coup in 1953 that deposed Dr Mossadeghe the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran?

America's compliant puppet the Shah could only hold onto power by a campgain of terror with the MOSSAD trained SAVAK that detained, tortured and murdered any dissenting Iranian voices. Thousands dissapeared and this action by the Americans ushered in the Mad Mullahs.

Congratulating Karzi is pre-ambulating aorund the outermost periphery of credulaty and is simply comedic.
7

Spoot,

Third rock pool on the left 03/11/2009 14:16:27
Britain has been getting itself mired in Afghan wars since 1839, invariably with dire consequencies, and the parallels with our earlier experiences are all too clear. Political corruption within Afghanistan has been one of the main causes of all the conflict in that country since 1839, so the latest fiasco should have come as no surprise.
8

A Clamper,

Edinburgh 03/11/2009 14:56:01
It's a farce. Troops out.
9

Douglas,

Bathgate 03/11/2009 19:34:10
#8, I beg to differ. It's an absolutely shameful disgrace foisted upon the world by feckless, useless, money grabbing lickspittle clowns in Armani suits, each one posturing and positioning for a good spot at the trough.
All hail President Blair/Miliband/any other dead eyed scumbag.
Can't fault you on the troops bit though.

10

Taz,

The Land of the Free. 03/11/2009 19:46:42
Re:"Remember the CIA organised, trained and backed coup in 1953 that deposed Dr Mossadeghe the first democratically elected Prime Minister of Iran?"


That's about the time frame Brits were murdering and torturing thousands of Kenyans. Was 400 years of looting the third world not enough for you
11

,

03/11/2009 20:56:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
12

,

04/11/2009 01:08:20
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
13

Chicane,

04/11/2009 02:33:48
Abdullah Abdullah had no right to delude the Afghan public in the first place. Why stand and the quit?
14

,

04/11/2009 03:07:39
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

,

04/11/2009 05:43:25
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.