Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Security guards 'machine-gunned Iraqis as they tried to surrender'

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 December 2008
PRIVATE security guards fired machine guns at innocent, surrendering Iraqis and launched a grenade into a girls' school, US prosecutors said yesterday.


Manslaughter charges were announced against five guards with Blackwater Worldwide.

A sixth guard for the US contractor admitted in a plea deal to killing at least one Iraqi in the 2007 shooting in Baghdad's Nisoor Square. Seventeen Iraqis were
killed.

The five guards surrendered yesterday and were due to ask a federal judge for bail.

"The tragic events in Nisoor Square were shocking and a violation of basic human rights," said the FBI assistant director, Joseph Persichini.

In addition to being charged with 14 counts of manslaughter, the five guards face 20 counts of attempted manslaughter.

The shooting unfolded in the crowded square, where prosecutors say civilians were going about their lives.

The guards tried to shut the intersection after a car bombing elsewhere in the city.

Witnesses said the guards opened fire unprovoked. Women and children were among the victims, and the shooting left the square littered with wrecked cars.

Blackwater, the largest security contractor in Iraq, says its guards were ambushed by insurgents while responding to a car bombing.

Pat Rowan, the national security prosecutor, said: "At least 34 unarmed Iraqi civilians, including women and children, were killed or injured without justification or provocation by these Blackwater security guards."

Paul Cassell, a defence lawyer, said: "We think it's pure and simply a case of self-defence. Tragically, people did die."

Although the case has been assigned to a judge in Washington DC, the accused men want it moved to Utah, the state in which they surrendered. There they have a good chance of finding a conservative jury pool, made up of people more likely to support the Iraq war.

Khalid Ibrahim, a 40-year-old electrician who said his father, Ibrahim Abid, 78, died in the shooting, said: "The killers must pay for their crime against innocent civilians.

"Justice must be achieved so that we can have rest from the agony we are living in.

"We know that the conviction of the people behind the shooting will not bring my father to life, but we will have peace in our minds and hearts."

The accused guards are former marines Donald Ball, from Utah, Dustin Heard, from Tennessee, and Evan Liberty, from New Hampshire; and army veterans Nick Slatten, from Tennessee, and Paul Slough, from Texas.



The guards face the prospect of 30-year mandatory prison terms under the anti-machine gun law passed during the height of the crack cocaine epidemic in the US.

The sixth Blackwater guard was identified as Jeremy Ridgeway, from California.

His sentencing in connection with his plea in the case has not yet been scheduled.

The shooting strained relations between the US and Baghdad. The fledgling Iraqi government wanted Blackwater expelled from the country. It also sought the right to prosecute the men in Iraqi courts.

Defence attorneys accused the US justice department of bowing to Iraqi pressure.

"We are confident that any jury will see this for what it is: a politically motivated prosecution to appease the Iraqi government," said defence attorney Steven McCool, who represents Ball.

Based in Moyock, North Carolina, Blackwater provides heavily armed guards for diplomats.

Since the shooting, the company has been a flashpoint in the debate on how heavily the United States relies on contractors in war zones.

The company was not charged over the deaths.





Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 08 December 2008 11:43 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
 
1

First Virginian,

USA 09/12/2008 01:24:58
Article Quote:

"Defence attorneys accused the US justice department of bowing to Iraqi pressure."

Answer:

President Bush confirmed in a TV interview that the Iraq War was the result of false CIA information of Sadaam's WMD.

When will the US Justice Department be bowing to American pressure to prosecute the guilty CIA personnel who caused the war?

The US will never get anyone to join the military once the precedent is set for our troops and guards to be prosecuted for doing their jobs in a war zone.

Bring our troops home from around the world so that we can defend our own borders.

Any sane jury will find these six men not guilty and will send the money-grubbing Iraqis packing back to where they came from.
2

,

09/12/2008 02:50:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
3

Guga II,

Rockall 09/12/2008 03:14:58
Despite the fact that these mercenary thugs are undoubtedly guilty of murder, they will probably be let off with minimal sentences, i.e. another My Lai massacre style whitewash, that is if they are convicted at all.

In addition to these murderous thugs being tried, their bosses at Blackwater should also be charged with murder; and these crimes should also be added to the list for the prosecution of the war criminal Bush and his cabinet.
4

First Virginian,

USA 09/12/2008 03:33:45
#2 Dave Crass & #3 GugaII,Rockall
Quotes:

"Bush Cheney regime" and "the war criminal Bush and his cabinet" seem to be redundant sentiments on your part.

Answer:
The CIA has admitted that they provided false information about Sadaam having WMD and pressured the US to rushing into a military action.

President Bush and his cabinet did not go to war without the consent of Congress.

So, who does that leave as the war criminals if there are any?

5

Pilrig.,

Livingston 09/12/2008 05:51:04
Winning hearts and minds !!!
6

Pilrig.,

Livingston 09/12/2008 05:52:00
4 - Don't blame Dubya - he's only the man in charge !
7

Guga II,

Rockall 09/12/2008 07:18:59
#4.

I suggest you read up on international law. Just because your congress agrees on something does not mean it can over-ride international law. American law is not supreme world law, despite the fact that your lot seem to think it is.

Bush and his cabinet are war criminals, as is the case with Bliar, Broon and Howard.
8

A True Scot.,

09/12/2008 08:36:55
7

Exactly not that we will have any chance to see justice done. These people are simply above the law and accountable to nobody and they insist we all live in a free and proud democracy.
They want to impose this free and proud democracy into other countries because they aint free and proud democracies but they do have lots of lovely resources so they deserve to be free and proud democracies and if it requires us to use violent and murderous mercenaries to bring a free and proud democracy then by Jimminy thats what we'll do.
Its God's work after all and righteous.
How can you possibly compare a spiritual, hardworking, family orintated, nonalcoholic, Quaran reading, proud Iraqi with a free and proud gun toting beer swilling overweight loudmouth self serving ignorant comic reading deluded yeehah shouting septic?
These Aarabs really have to be cultured even if it kills them or should I say even when it kills them.
9

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 09/12/2008 09:32:05
None of these atrocities would ever take place if the arrogant Americans and Brits pulled out of the illegal war, a war they keep claiming has already been won. International law is a joke, the Americans and Brits do as they please and get away with it time and again. Hang Bush and Brown with the same rope at the same time, it will save time and money.
10

Teofilio Cubillas,

09/12/2008 09:34:22
#1 First Virginian

"The US will never get anyone to join the military once the precedent is set for our troops and guards to be prosecuted for doing their jobs in a war zone"

They may be your troops but they're not your guards, they're Blackwater's guards. They should not be able to hide under the cover of US military law when called to account for their actions. And anyway, since when was the murder of civilians the 'job' of any soldier or guard in wartime? Maybe in Soviet Russia or Nazi Germany circa 1943, but surely to God not in the 21st century by the United States? Get a moral compass man.
11

Few Against Many,

09/12/2008 09:34:59
9. Sort yourself out mate. You are a broken record and a boring one at that.
12

Dumb Eye @,

Not cloud cuckoo land 09/12/2008 09:50:07
#1 - legalities of war, CIA, etc aside, how is it the job of private security guards to shoot an unarmed populace going about its lawful business in a crowded public square?

Any sane jury would find these a-holes guilty, and send their money-grubbing employers somewhere fitting.
13

Number 6,

Germany 09/12/2008 11:10:03
These animals should be incarcerated in Abu grab prison. Now THAT would be poetic justice.

1# Virgin man,

you will always have plenty of cannon fodder just waiting to join up. Why do you think your goverment with-held needed donated supplies to the people of new orleans while at the same time, demolished their perfectly good houses ?.

To force them into the military of course. That's why you have no real social security in the US, you need cannon fodder and only the truely desperate join up these days.

Having been so hilariousley wrong throughout the recent election campaign, I find it amazing you have the nerve to voice an opinion on anything.
14

,

09/12/2008 11:40:24
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
15

A True Scot.,

09/12/2008 13:59:34
15

Only their military and politicians.
16

Bele's bane,

Scotland 09/12/2008 14:23:00
Most investigative reports seem to indicate that Bush and his fellow war criminals manipulated and misrepresented the intelligence available before deceiving even the UN before ordering the invasion and occupation of Iraq.

Any person of average intelligence could readily discern that a third rate dictator like Saddam running a fourth rate country like Iraq could not possibly pose a threat to the USA.

By the time his fleet of rowing boats crossed the Atlantic towing their imaginary H Bomb behind the last rowing boat in some Iraqi housewife's washing tub the rowers would be simply too exhausted to attack America.

Remember My Li? Lt William Calley murdered some 500 unarmed civilian Vietnamese villagers and the US Military managed to keep that quiet for some two years.

He was pardoned by Nixon for his act of mass murder.

Madeleine Albright in a television interview was asked if she thought that the deaths of 250,000 Iraqi babies as a consequence of American sanctions was worth it. Her joyous response was, "Yes of course it was worth the price"

Not many months after that, 9/11 happened. I was not altogether surprised!
17

,

09/12/2008 14:41:56
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
18

Number 6,

Germany 09/12/2008 14:47:07
17 The wonderful Colin Powell was the investigating officer for the Mai Lai massacre. He flew into vietnam,held one interview with the formation Commander, who was not even present during the atrocities.

He then flew back to Washington and gave the unit a clean bill of health. Nothing untoward happened according to Powell.

Spotted as a future asset he was fast-tracked promoted,despite never commanding US forces in the field. Even when he could be dragged kicking and screaming into Vietnam it was as a rear echelon gofer or an "Observer" with the vietnamese forces.

His auto-biography has some startling admissions on the tactics and brutality of US forces in Vietnam, but of course no mention whatsoever about his Mai lai cover up.

The casual attitude towards violence and slaughter still seems to be deeply entrenched in the US mindset.

19

Bele's bane,

Scotland 09/12/2008 14:53:12
Post #19 Number 6 Germany,

Thanks for filling out some of the details, so much remains hidden to this day!
20

A True Scot.,

09/12/2008 17:18:37
I see the censorship on here hasnt improved any.
21

First Virginian,

USA 09/12/2008 17:36:06
All of these headline grabbing comments are from only the prosecution's side and are not actual evidence.

The US Justice Department gives the prosecution's side of the picture to a Federal grand jury that is to decide if there is "probable cause" that a crime was committed.

If the grand jury votes that there is probable cause that a crime or crimes were committed based on the prosecution's presentation...then they vote to indict...or bring to trial.

This was only the first round to decide if there were crimes committed that could be prosecuted under Federal jurisdiction.

When the actual trials begin then the defense attorneys will go to work to give real evidence that will give the guards' side of the story.

Blaring out all of this so-called evidence is a case of the news media declaring the men guilty before the trials even begin.

Changing the venue to another place than DC is most important because of the anti-war politicians and liberals that abound there.

Tne news media is famous for convicting people of crimes on the basis of personal bias...as is true in this case.

Trial by a jury of your peers dates back to the English Magna Charta and was enshrined in the US Constitution.

Having the trials in the US rather than Iraq has a far greater chance of being a fair trial rather than a "kangaroo court" that would have happened in Iraq.
22

Globetrotter_scot,

09/12/2008 18:36:52
22. Virginian.

So are you saying that the media should refrain from claiming that Osama Bin Laden was behind 9/11 only until after he is brought to trial?

Also, if you remember, My Lai was a whitewash. Excuse us if we are skeptical of the final result of these trials.
23

Mark2?,

09/12/2008 19:37:56
#23 FBI Declares Lack of Evidence to Connect Bin Laden to 9/11
http://english.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=8503300169
but we knew that
24

A True Scot.,

09/12/2008 19:38:10
23

Exactly the media also says the person behind the 9/11 attack has confessed in Gitmo lets Osama of the hook then doesnt it?
25

,

09/12/2008 19:42:31
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
26

First Virginian,

USA 09/12/2008 22:04:28
#23 Globetrotter

Quote:

"...if you remember, My Lai was a whitewash...we are skeptical of the final results of these trials."

Answer:

Globetrotter, are you saying that because you don't agree with the results of the My Lai inquiry that there shouldn't be a trial at all?

You undoubtedly know from the beginning the truth of the matter before the trial.

Do you often hear voices or are you just clairvoyant?

27

Carolyn 1,

09/12/2008 23:13:02
To give some balance of the above article, this is part of the defense lawyers statement:

"On September 16, 2007, on the dangerous streets of Baghdad, a State Department official and her security detail were attacked by insurgents using a roadside bomb.

A second security team, including our clients, was sent to assist and in the process of securing an escape route were drawn into a firefight with insurgents in Nissor Square.

Iraqi insurgents do not wear uniforms, and often disguise themselves as Iraqi soldiers or police to ambush U.S. forces.

The tools of these insurgents include car bombs, roadside bombs, suicide bombers and automatic weapons.
Faced with this enemy, these young men were fighting for their lives in a crowded, dangerous and chaotic environment.

It is an unfortunate fact of war that in a country where terrorists and insurgents hide behind civilians to attack U.S. personnel, civilian casualties will result.

These casualties are not the fault of our military and security forces however, but rather the fault of the insurgents who use women and children as shields, behind which they launch their cowardly attacks.

Today, prosecutors in Washington, DC, seated comfortably in the safety of well guarded offices three thousand miles away from this deadly war zone, have seen fit to second guess how these decorated veterans of the military fought for the lives of their comrades and themselves.

Worse they have charged these young men with offenses which could put them in prison for the rest of their lives for their efforts to save their own lives and the lives of others.....
28

Carolyn 1,

09/12/2008 23:15:59
30 years for self-defense is over reaching. Waaaaay over reaching

The public would be furious, Human Rights Organizations would be swarming if a minority shot someone in self-defense and was put on trial with a 30 year manadtory sentence...

Double standards
29

,

10/12/2008 02:51:09
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
30

,

10/12/2008 14:06:11
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
31

Findlay Thompson,

15/12/2008 09:18:25
Excuse me posters, you'll have to jog my memory. Why are the US military occupying Iraq at the present time?
32

matt clark,

San Francisco 10/01/2009 06:38:30



Come on guys... Are we supposed to believe that the Blackwater guys just decided to open fire on a bunch of civilians for no reason whatsoever? Duh??

At this late date it is (or should be) common knowledge that terrorists and insurgents have time and again hide themselves in and among everyday civilians.
They also hide their weapons in civilian homes and store bombs, guns, ammo, etc in Mosques and other 'civilian' points of interest. And should any 'civilians' get caught in the middle, the leftist pot-head journalists, with an agenda, swarm in and kiss their hinnys up and down.

This amazes you?? Sounds like most of the rabid finger pointers around here are talking through their 'medical' marijuana.

Matt.





 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.