Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Tensions rise as India points finger at Pakistani militants

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 01 December 2008
TENSIONS between India and Pakistan intensified last night as a Pakistani militant group was blamed for the Mumbai terror attacks that left at least 174 people dead.
Joint crime police commissioner Rakesh Maria said a "hardcore group" from the Pakistani militant group Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) was behind the carefully planned attacks.

The group has long been seen as a creation of the Pakistani intelligence service
to help wage its clandestine war against India in disputed Kashmir.

The development came after New Delhi raised security to "war level" and insisted upon a Pakistani link to the attacks.

Earlier a US counter-terrorism official said some "signatures of the attack" were consistent with Lashkar and another group that has operated in Kashmir. Both are said to be linked to al-Qaeda.

Yesterday saw the resignation of India's top security official as the government struggled under growing accusations of security failures following terror attacks.

Home minister Shivraj Patil, who has become highly unpopular during a long series of terror attacks across India, submitted his letter of resignation to prime minister Manmohan Singh, who accepted.

The Cabinet shuffling comes as a chorus of criticism about the government's handling of the Mumbai attacks grows louder.

"Our Politicians Fiddle as Innocents Die," read a headline on Sunday in the Times of India newspaper.

A day after the siege ended, authorities were still removing victims' bodies from the Taj Mahal hotel, where three suspected Muslim militants made a last stand before Indian commandos killed them in a blaze of gunfire and explosions.

Yesterday, the waterfront landmark, popular among foreign tourists and Indian high society, was surrounded by metal barricades, its shattered windows boarded over. At the famous Gateway of India basalt arch nearby, a shrine of candles, flowers and messages commemorated victims.

"We have been to two funerals already," Mumbai resident Karin Dutta said, as she placed a small bouquet of white flowers for friends killed in the hotel. "We're going to another one now."

The rampage was carried out by gunmen at ten sites across Mumbai, starting on Wednesday night. At least 239 were wounded.

The death toll was revised down from 195, after authorities said some bodies were counted twice, but they said it could rise again, as areas of the Taj Mahal hotel were still being searched. Among the dead were 18 foreigners, including six Americans. Nine gunmen were killed.

The dead also included Germans, Canadians, Israelis and nationals from Britain, Italy, Japan, China, Thailand, Australia and Singapore.

Indian officials said the sole surviving gunman, now in custody, was from Pakistan and voiced suspicions about their neighbour.

Islamabad responded by stating that it was prepared to move troops to the Indian border if the diplomatic situation worsened. Pakistan has categorically denied any links between the militants and its state agencies.

The war of words has raised fears of a possible surge of violence in the sub-continent. The nuclear-armed rivals have fought three wars against each other, two over the disputed region of Kashmir.

Prime minister Singh called a rare meeting of leaders from the country's main political parties to discuss the situation.

As officials pointed the finger at "elements in Pakistan", public ire over the government's actions widened.

"People are worried, but the key difference is anger," said Rajesh Jain, chief executive officer at brokerage firm Pranav Securities. "Does the government have the will, the ability to tackle the dangers we face?"

Meanwhile, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said Britain must reassess its ability to respond to terrorist attacks in the wake of the massacre in Mumbai.

She added that the attacks would "test" the warming of relations between India and Pakistan, which she said was "fundamental" to tackling terrorism.

Her comments follow suggestions from the chair of the Commons counter-terrorism sub committee that Britain would be ill-prepared to cope with a similar assault.

Patrick Mercer said the Olympics in London would be a "magnet" for terrorists.

"What can happen in Mumbai could just as well happen in Manchester or Birmingham. We'd find it very difficult to cope with this style of attack."

'He didn't even look back, he just fired'

THE militants waited in the shadows for the police van to pass – then sprayed it with gunfire when it slowed down in the narrow road.

The gunmen opened the doors and dumped five officers' bodies into the streets, before climbing into the van to continue their attack.

What they did not know was that two officers, including Constable Arun Jadhav, were in the back seat, alive.

Mr Jadhav yesterday revealed details of his escape, after being driven through Mumbai by some of the gunmen who launched a string of attacks and a siege which would last for 60 more hours. At least 174 people have died and 295 been injured.

Mr Jadhav was hit by three bullets, two of which left his hands nearly paralysed.

While one of the men drove the van, another pointed his rifle out of the window and fired on a crowd outside a cinema. Later, he threw a grenade outside a state government building.

The young gunmen said little, but are said to have spoken Hindi with a strong Punjabi, north-Indian accent.

At one point, a mobile phone in Mr Jadhav's colleague's pocket rang. The gunman in the front seat turned around and fired.

"He didn't even look back properly, he just fired," Mr Jadhav said. "I think my colleague had been still alive. He died with those bullets."

Finally, one of the van's tires went flat, and the gunmen abandoned the vehicle.

Mr Jadhav used the police radio to call for backup. He is now recovering in hospital.

IN QUOTES

AN ELITE Black Cat Commando involved in the Taj Mahal Palace hotel siege last night told of the dramatic search for survivors.

Sunil Kumar said: "Things were bad. Everyone was scared. Nobody knew what was happening. We were just focused on the terrorists."

He said the troops were split into two teams, combing the hotel top to bottom.

"We cleared the sixth floor and roof without incident. Then the fifth. Then the fourth. By the time we got to the third floor, it was late. There were simply too many rooms. Many wouldn't open. Even with the master key. We had to enter by force to get people out who were too scared to evacuate."

He said a hotel employee who was guiding them through the building was gunned down.

"On the third floor a door swung open and he was gunned down. He wasn't wearing a bullet-proof vest. I dragged him out of range of the shots. But as I did, I received three rounds to my back. The terrorists were well trained. I couldn't see my attacker as I was dragging the guide away and had my back turned to him," he said.






Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 30 November 2008 10:03 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Indian terrorist attacks
 
1

Rob Bennett,

Point Piper Australia 01/12/2008 02:00:22
Good grief, it looks like both India and Pakistan now have their fingers on the nuclear button. I cant imagine India would be willing to start a war when their economy is about to go into orbit.
2

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 01/12/2008 03:54:08
Pakistan has done a very poor job at curtailing terrorists operating within its borders from launching cross border operations in Afghanistan and India.

Every time the US uses the very effective strategy of targeting the Al-Qaeda and Taliban leadership structure using Predator Drones, we hear the familiar whine from Pakistan that its sovereignty is being undermined.

If you can not control what happens within your borders, you really can't claim to exercise sovereignty.

If Pakistan wish others to respect it's sovereignty, it must first assert its sovereignty.

The other major base for Islamic terrorists is the UK. With 4,000 known to have attended terrorists training camps.

If the UK fails to curb terrorists from the UK attacking targets outside the UK, you may find that the visa free travel that UK citizens enjoy to most countries becomes a thing of the past.

Who knows, at some future date you may even see Predator Drones flying over Bradford.
3

Finlang,

France 01/12/2008 04:38:31
#2 KampungHighlander

"Who knows, at some future date you may even see Predator Drones flying over Bradford."

Not as daft as it may sound to some. Western civilisations have a real problem in this area. UK politicians are uniquely stupid to ignore it, but then they are only motivated by self-interest.
4

Mashimaro,

China 01/12/2008 08:24:49
#2 Oh no campy, surely if the UK can't control the terrorists within its borders the US should bomb the UK.

The truth is that by continually attacking across Pakistan's borders, the US as continually unermined the government, made them look weak and inefficient and has driven supporters to the terrorists. Leave them the hell alone. Police your own borders.

This attack is just way beyond the sophistication of any goat herder in Pakistan. Let's be frank here. And 10 men? TEN? Who are they trying to fool? Not even Holywood would believe only 10 men managed to pull this off. Give me a break.
5

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

01/12/2008 09:02:01
'Both are said to be linked to al-Qaeda.'
What utter b*****t. There is little evidence for this other than hearsay. There is far more evidence that they are backed, or have been backed in the past by the Pakistan military. This attack has far more to do with Pakistan and India's standoff over Kashmir and
India can't exactly take the moral high ground on that, so lets stop this desperate looking for an international dimension. The 'international community's' priority should be safeguarding their own citizens caught up in the troubles and if possible offer mediation between the two sides, not trying to escalate the conflict as some posters are advocating.
6

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

01/12/2008 09:03:42
'(NB. I know that so far none of these murderers have been proved to have a British connection. I wanted to make a bigger point).'

I hope on reflection you realise how utterly stupid that sounds.
7

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 01/12/2008 09:14:30
#4 Mashimaro,
Oh come on Mashimaro, you know that Bruce Willis could pull that off !:))))))

#2 KampungHighlander,
Yah and you live in such a peaceful country eh, and I see that you are the Muslim version of a Mormon, with multiple wives.
What's the matter, in your 'faith' women are only good as servants and to please you in the bedroom?
Nice 'faith' you're following.
8

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

01/12/2008 09:31:59
#9 Spouting garbage whilst cheerfully confessing that you have not evidence to back it up seems to be your forte, RbnR.
9

Finnking,

Lempäälä 01/12/2008 10:09:05
Not one single element of the Mumbai attacking force derived from the 'uk'. The 'uk' papers just happily spewed out their racist propaganda last week without a care for the people in the 'uk' who happen to be peaceful, hard working Muslims. It was a revolting display of 'uk' media's deeper agenda to demonise Islam so that when WE massacre Muslims by the million there's not the same "horror!" articles as we've seen over this particular atrocity. (Note too that there has been many such events in India recently. This one made the news over days in teh west because some of the dead were 'western'. No white man dies = not big news. What does that tell us about our media?)

KampungHighlander, again, seems to display fuzzy logic in his/her reasoning:

1. "Every time the US uses the very effective strategy of targeting the Al-Qaeda and Taliban leadership structure using Predator Drones, we hear the familiar whine from Pakistan that its sovereignty is being undermined."

and then....

2. "If Pakistan wish others to respect it's sovereignty, it must first assert its sovereignty"

While the US ignores international borders, a) the Pakistan government cannot claim to be 'sovereign' to its people and b) the US cannot complain about others ignoring international borders.

As to teh idea of foreign fighters: How many of the NATO force currently bombing and shooting and killing in Afghanistan even speak the local languages? Very few if any. If your argument is based upon the idea that foreign combatants are 'bad', then you must, for logic's sake, agree that US/'uk'/NATO are foreign and therefore 'bad'.

In terms of providing home to 'terrorists': Google "School of the Americas", look at the number of terrorists given homes in the US and the 'uk' and look at how many lunatic groups the US/'uk' support around teh world.

Let's not blame "Muslims" for this and other atrocities. Let's pluck our heads out of the dung of western propaganda (and eastern) and see that it's
10

Finnking,

Lempäälä 01/12/2008 10:09:23
cont......

Let's not blame "Muslims" for this and other atrocities. Let's pluck our heads out of the dung of western propaganda (and eastern) and see that it's power that uses religion to control the local herd to do its bidding. There's no difference between what these clowns did last week and what the US/'uk' have doing for 100 years or more; except that US/'uk' do it so much better and so more frequently. Just because they use bombers and men in uniforms waving wee national flags/logos doesn't make it any less dreadful.
11

AJ Fife,

01/12/2008 10:38:10
Who makes the best curries: India or Pakistan?

Is this question the 'sauce' of the tension?

The world demands to know.
12

Bo28,

Edinburgh 01/12/2008 11:18:26
I see the western media is doing its job well. Lots of British on here who know a lot about what they've been told. The trouble is what they have been told is bull****.

Al Queda means 'The database'.
Al Qaeda is a CIA creation.
Al Qaeda is still a CIA tool.

The war on terror is mostly fabricated lies designed to bolster support for illegal wars for profit and to facilitate the stripping of hard earned rights from Europeans and Americans through 'fighting terrorism'.

Regime change, occupation of countries and the loading down of western nations with huge debt that has just started to hit the ordinary people (not that it counts too greatly considering what Iraqi's and others are suffering). This debt is owed to the private bankers who own MI5, MI6, CIA, the media (reuters and the associated press) and most of the western oil companies.

Of course they will get their way because 95% of those who read this will be telling themselves its rubbish without looking into it.

Kiss your rights goodbye, and start looking for a ditch to hide in when Russia or China has had enough of blatant u.s aggression.
13

Scimitar1,

01/12/2008 11:34:31
# 11 - Utter leftist h*rseshit, It would be suprising if they were NOT involved given the facts.

FACT : Scotland based Pakistani's are funding Kashmir terrorists to the tune of £50,000,000 per year.

FACT : The terrorists were connecting their wireless Blackberries to radical islamic Northern England servers DURING the attrocity.

FACT : Several different sources have independently reported terrorists had Midlands and Yorkshire accents.

FACT : 4000 trained Islamic jihadist's under surveilance in Britain.

http://news.scotsman.com/world/Counterfeit-DVD-gang-funds-.3616379.jp


14

Finnking,

Lempäälä 01/12/2008 11:51:41
Scimitar1

FACT: you automatically assume the veracity of any media. "A security official said" does not mean it's a "FACT".

How much of your tax money is being used to fund western terrorism in the region? FACT: A lot more than these groups could possibly hope to gather.

Do you honestly believe that £50 million each year leaves Scotland in cash and travels towards Dubai purely to aid the Kashmiri groups who are, BTW, fighting in their part of the world?

Let's assume for the moment that you are right and some small groups of Scots are sending some money to the area to fight the western powers. Do you not see that the fact your tax money is being used to kill folk in the area is just as bad?

Leftist? Hardly. These groups are more right wing/authoritarian than NATO.
15

Newton_Invented_Gravity,

01/12/2008 12:10:59
exactly-these people are Kashmiri separatists. The issue of Kahmir has nothing to do with us in the UK. Let the Indians and the Pakistanis sort this one out. We just have to try and not get caught in the cross fire.
16

Gunga Din,

01/12/2008 12:19:52
#15

How can 8,000 adult Pakistanis ( the number of adults living in Scotland ) fund 50 million quid a year ?
That's over 6250 EACH ,according to your fact , every year.

Utter tosh , you know it , and we all know it.
17

POSTMARK,-55,

China, 01/12/2008 12:33:58
#15 Scimitar1,
FACT: All your facts are more propaganda and people like you just keep falling for it because you are so narrow-minded and hateful towards anyone different than you.
FACT: Your government has been pulling the wool over your eyes as long as there has been a government and the fear-mongering they are guilty of gets eaten up by the likes of you.
FACT: The Scotsman wouldn't know a FACT if it was to jump up and bite them on the nose, and that goes for you as well.
FACT: Keep interfering in areas where your country doesn't belong and these type of attacks will become more frequent and will increase in intensity.
FACT: Keep kissing US butt and you'll just get dragged down deeper until you have to look 'down 'to see 'up'.
FACT: The reason you're in Iraq in the first place is because the US kept tabs on Blair's personal and private life and they have got Browns number as well.
18

cramond1,

Peace Train 01/12/2008 12:42:32
There are enough Scotsman readers to deal with racist humbug and nonsense, and who know, like the US soldiers themselves, that their wars stink.

I will add that as a British man I sincerely hope and believe that Indians and Pakistanis can solve their differences themselves (I believe they can) and without any interference from the increasingly ignorant west which unbelievably--perhaps--continues to export its (not it's) ghastly violence. I hope they will show us that violence is not the answer.
19

Finnking,

Lempäälä 01/12/2008 14:18:33
Postmark

Hi, what's -"because the US kept tabs on Blair's personal and private life and they have got Browns number as well." - all about? More data?
20

P. Lee,

01/12/2008 14:34:24
Nothing good will come out of this

#15 Scimitar1
Are you CIA agent and know something that we dont or are you just ill informed?
21

An Greumach Mor,

Scotland 01/12/2008 15:05:34
All you dafties trying to justify the murder and the links.

It is very simple. The juhadists believe the war should continue until all the world submits to Islam or pays the tax to be allowed to be an infidel.

The problem is Islam and jihad is the method of expansion.

I for one would like to see Islam being eradicated from the western world.

Blaming the USA is stupid if they wanted to kill muslims they would carpet bomb the centres of population all year.

Mass murder is an Jihadist weapon
22

Bemused and above it all,

01/12/2008 17:15:38
the bit i find strange is that continually following these attrocities, the people involved hin the planning & execution of these attacks are from Pakistan or Saudi, yet we want to pick a fight with Iran?
Either pull out and gaurd the borders, tell the serbs we got it wrong and let them lose on protecting Europe from the ground base we have allowed to build up in the balkans or go Nuclear on Iran, Pakistan & Saudi.
the devastation caused ended WWII, it made shinto become the peaceful religion it is once more instead of a propoganda tool. Anyone see any similarity?
23

James Donald,

Newbridge 01/12/2008 17:57:31
#4 Mashimaro,Red China - "Give me a break" - Neck? Leg?
24

,

01/12/2008 21:36:58
Comment Removed By Administrator
Reason:
25

KampungHighlander,

Jakarta 02/12/2008 03:41:34
#8 Skidmark 55

"ah and you live in such a peaceful country eh, and I see that you are the Muslim version of a Mormon, with multiple wives. What's the matter, in your 'faith' women are only good as servants and to please you in the bedroom? Nice 'faith' you're following."

You seem to have the impression that I am a Muslim living a polygamist lifestyle. I am in fact an Atheist who happens to be married to 1 Muslim woman. Thought I do admit the idea of having a harem does hold some appeal, I found the idea of circumcision and professing a belief in god more than I would be willing to trade off.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.