Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement


Flagship junior Asbos cost £½m each in taxpayers' cash

Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 20 June 2008
JUNIOR antisocial behaviour orders (Asbos) for youngsters, the flagship youth-crime policy of the previous Labour-led Scottish Executive, proved so unsuccessful that only 14 were ever issued in Scotland, at a cost of £500,000 each, it emerged yesterday.
The Asbos for under-16s were introduced by the Labour- Liberal Democrat administration as part of its crackdown on youth crime.

But Fergus Ewing, the SNP community safety minister, told MSPs yesterday that there had only been 14 junior Asbos
ever issued in Scotland, while the project had cost £7 million.

Mr Ewing said it was no surprise that the policy had been questioned by the new Scottish Government.

Yesterday, the minister unveiled a new framework to combat youth offending which will place more emphasis on early intervention and prevention.

He told MSPs £7 million of government funding has been devoted to Asbos for under-16s since 2004, adding: "Only 14 have been issued. It is perhaps no surprise their appropriateness and effectiveness have been questioned."

Cathy Craigie, for Labour, questioned whether the success of Asbos should be measured in their numbers.

She said: "When Asbos were issued, it would mean other methods and interventions had failed. It seems strange to measure that as an indicator of success or otherwise."

However, this argument was rejected by Mr Ewing. "I think we have to take into account the effectiveness of the expenditure of public money," he said.

"If £7 million has been devoted to a group of measures called junior Asbos which have resulted in 14 being issued, then the cost is £500,000 per junior Asbo."

Mr Ewing highlighted an Audit Scotland report of last year which indicated the impact of the measure in improving the situation had not yet been demonstrated.

He said if £7 million had been spent on creating more choices and opportunities for youngsters, instead of junior Asbos, the result in terms of outcomes "might be more successful".

The £7 million was allocated to Scotland's local authorities over a four-year period.

Councils were told to spend the money on junior Asbos, not just in implementing the orders but also in intervening at an early stage with those at risk of getting the orders in an attempt to stop antisocial behaviour.

Bill Aitken, the Tories' justice spokesman, said junior Asbos were "a monumental waste of public money".

BACKGROUND

ADULT Asbos were introduced across the UK in an attempt to crack down on antisocial behaviour.

They were generally sought by local authorities against people who were found to have been disrupting their neighbourhoods, and courts set conditions on where such people could go and what they could do.

If they continued to breach their orders, then they risked ultimately being sent to prison.

The antisocial behaviour orders were extended to under-16s across the UK in 2004 in a blaze of publicity from the Labour government.

Jack McConnell, the then First Minister, followed the London line because he wanted a crackdown on youth offending.

By 2006, only four had been issued in Scotland and, in total, there have only ever been 14 in the four years since their inception.

Indeed, Kathleen Marshall, the Scottish Children's Commissioner, recently praised Scottish authorities for not seeking as many junior Asbos as their counterparts in England.

There was controversy in England two years ago when it emerged that youngsters were trying to get junior Asbos because they saw them as a "badge of honour".

This argument was always rejected by the Scottish Executive simply because so few junior Asbos had been given out north of the Border.

The actual cost of adult Asbos is usually quite low – they are estimated to cost local authorities between £600 and £2,000 each.



Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 19 June 2008 10:10 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: Youth crime
 
1

Alasdair10,

Glasgow 20/06/2008 16:29:38
It takes a certain special sort of special to whizz so much up a wall on so small an amount of people.

How many supporting agencies supported one another in the "rehabilitation" of these clowns ( you don't get an asbo for a first offence).

I would love to see a list and a chart highlighting the roles and routes taken in order to reveal who is involved and how much each individial agency takes as their cut. In addition to this how many of these asbo beauties have benefitted from their "lessons learned" scenario?
2

observer9,

Glasgow 20/06/2008 16:54:27
More is spent on the needs of the neds than on supporting entrepreneurship in this country.

These little darlings will spend less time in jail than it takes to wade through the innovation inhibiting grant process for the people who are potential employers and wealth generators.

And please don’t get me started on them being “vulnerable”. Vulnerable to what, acting up, using the group support “I’ve got issues” malarkey, it wisnae me, it’s not my fault. Actually it is your fault.

“Councils were told to spend the money on junior Asbos, not just in implementing the orders but also in intervening at an early stage with those at risk of getting the orders in an attempt to stop antisocial behaviour.”

“Intervention”, get real, these guys are taking the mick out of all the “support agencies”. The first commentator has a point how many people are involved in this shambles.
3

it has always been allan,

20/06/2008 18:24:39
Scotland's softies banned any form of corporal punishment. And now just throw their plentiful money at any problem.
in the bad old days these lads would have got a different sort of asbo whichwould cost nothing and been more effective.

But this remark will not earn socialist brownie points and wll probably get removed
4

Senga Jean,

21/06/2008 00:43:07
THs was not any failure, this was a Labour failure, BIGTIME>
5

Senga Jean,

21/06/2008 00:44:29
AND of course A lib/dem failure.
6

Allan(handofgod137),

21/06/2008 14:03:02
Birching would be more cost effective, and more of a deterrent.
7

The Former Mr. Angry,

Perth 21/06/2008 15:32:01
"A fine specimen of the older type of British battleship, the "Mars" was moored in the Tay on the 17th of August, 1869, for the purpose of being used as a training-ship for boys without suitable homes, or beyond the control of parents". See

www.dundeecity.gov.uk/centlib/photopolis/mars.htm

You can be sure that this option cost very little and that the maritime discipline which the boys were expected to follow did not include Playstations or Buckie. Nor were there herds of social workers mopping up after them and or courts showering them with asbos and money. More likely if they stepped out of line as was the custom of the time they were awarded the cat-o-nine-tails. But they were also taught seamanship as well as the strict discipline, so at least ended up with a suitable skill.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.