Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

 
 
Saturday, 17th May 2008 Change Date

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the The Scotsman site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Did Pakistan pull the plug on YouTube's worldwide operations?



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 26 February 2008
THE Pakistan government has been blamed for causing a global blackout of YouTube during a botched attempt to block its own citizens accessing the site.
The government in Islamabad is said to have told internet service providers (ISP) on Friday that the clip-sharing website was off-limits due to content deemed offensive to Islam.

But experts believed attempts by at least one ISP to comply with th
e ban resulted in users around the world being blocked by mistake yesterday.

The offending material was not specified, but it is believed to have been a trailer for an upcoming film by Geert Wilders, a Dutch politician. He has said he plans to release an anti-Islamic film which portrays the religion as fascist and prone to inciting violence against women and homosexuals.

It is thought a two-hour global YouTube "outage" was connected to attempts by Pakistan Telecom and ISP provider PCCW to comply with the demand. To do this, the YouTube address was "hijacked" by the providers and Pakistan users attempting to access the site were redirected. But it appears the block leaked out from Pakistan, resulting in a global ban.

Wahaj-us-Siraj, convener of the Association of Pakistan Internet Service Providers, said: "They (Pakistan's telecommunications authority] asked us to ban it immediately... and the order says the ban will continue until further notice.

"(YouTube users in Pakistan] are upset. They're screaming at ISPs which can't do anything."

The block on international servers ended when engineers at YouTube, which is owned by Google, contacted PCCW.

A YouTube spokesman said: "For about two hours, traffic to YouTube was routed according to erroneous internet protocols, and many users around the world could not access our site.

"We have determined the source of these events was a network in Pakistan. We are investigating and working to prevent this from happening again."

Padraig Reidy, online editor of the anti-censorship magazine, Index on Censorship, said:

"While they (the Pakistan government] may be claiming they are protecting social cohesion, I think we are looking at much darker motives.

"I think they are more interested in blocking other content on YouTube, videos of anti-government protests and, more generally, ideas that contradict theirs."

Mr Reidy said the move would make the government unpopular as the internet and television were key sources for news and information.

He added: "This has backfired on the government. The Pakistan people are already suspicious of the authorities and this just confirms that they're trying to keep them in the dark."

Other countries that have temporarily blocked access to YouTube include Turkey and Thailand. Meanwhile, China is known for its stringent control of internet content.

However, Mr Reidy said authorities in Beijing were more concerned with internal internet use. "Internally, it is controlled at a very local level. People know the rules. Once they criticise the government the controls kick in."

Mr Reidy said that this was done in a "laborious" manner by paying people to monitor blogs and message sites, intervening to redirect conversations which stray towards criticism of the government.





The full article contains 520 words and appears in The Scotsman newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 25 February 2008 10:01 PM
  • Source: The Scotsman
  • Location: Edinburgh
  • Related Topics: YouTube
 
1

The Strategist,

26/02/2008 00:35:09
Astonishing. I thought Pakistan was a democracy.
2

Ross Fyffe,

Scotland 26/02/2008 02:22:52
Nope Pakistan was upset that youtube would not permit the uploading of fanaticalk isl;amic terrorists doing the old headoctomy of infidels
3

Rulesbutnotrulers,

Federation, not separation 26/02/2008 08:18:17
If websites can be remotely closed down, why aren't all extremist, porno, vile and paedo sites eliminated?
4

The Independent Republic of Section N,

26/02/2008 08:18:35
Good.

Sick of you tube - sick of getting sent links to watch the latest amazing clip which turns out to be the usual gash.

Get a life
5

Gwnefyr,

Japan 26/02/2008 11:21:49
#1 The Strategist,no democratic regime assasinates an opposition leader during or not elections.Pakistan regime is not near democracy.It is favoured by the USA. Sadly,just as in many other not-developing countries.
6

Itchy,

26/02/2008 17:17:18
"The offending material was not specified, but it is believed to have been a trailer for an upcoming film by Geert Wilders, a Dutch politician. He has said he plans to release an anti-Islamic film which portrays the religion as fascist and prone to inciting violence against women and homosexuals."

Is that not exactly what it is?

#4 sod off and mind your own business you fascist. Find out what an off switch does.
7

Neil,

Glasgow 26/02/2008 17:32:27
"fascist and prone to inciting violence against women and homosexuals."

Is that not exactly what it is?"

The twin to Christianity then.

But if somebody was caught in Britain downloading a site by Moslems which said pretty much that about Chritians would they not be in trouble.

Indeed did we not recently have a court case where the terrorists had done nothing more active than that?

8

Trade-wind,

USA 26/02/2008 19:30:29
Some times I wonder if you people have any brains at all.
9

Itchy,

26/02/2008 22:14:21
#7 "The twin to Christianity then."

Don't care, I'm an atheist.

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.